robertsondavies, you've been using a very broad brush with your use of they. Please don't presume to know my motivation(s). If I want quick convenience, I use 98. But I live here and require use of 30A daily, I know the perils of my decisions. I believe you don't live here. Is that correct?
ok, enlighten me. What is your specific motivation again why you can't have LSV's travel on the 2 mile stretch at Deer Lake state park on 30A, like the State has wisely allowed everywhere else south of 98?
Maybe its the case that you're not striving for a bit of extra convenience that speeding through that stretch provides - remind me what makes your argument distinct from the broad brush that was so dangerously wielded by me. LOL
What is your motivation?
please don't say "safety" willy nilly, because for example 'one time' you saw a 14 year old driving one. Unless you've got the goods to refute what 10 years of
Actuaries from insurance companies empirically know about LSV's then go to your next reason please. We who support LSV' use expansion, would like to fully consider all arguments against it.
keep the dialogue going. I meant no disrespect by my use of the term "THEY" - really. I was categorizing unfairly perhaps - lets stick to the issues here (myself included) all.
1. Is 30A a cohesive resort area, or not?
2. Should the last couple miles of 30A be made LSV compatible by reducing the speed limit thereon from 45 to 35?
3. Should bikers, helmetless pedestrians and LSV's been banned from the HIGHWAY 30A altogether, reserving it to be the last bastion of speedy thoroughfare for construction trucks, delivery trucks, and heavy artillery?