• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
New posts

Yzarctoo

Beach Fanatic
Mar 6, 2009
282
103
Now I understand why it appeared that Obama had the press in his pocket...not only in his pocket, but actual working for him, planning their reports talking points, agreeing to ignoring certain stories, even plotting take downs of other news group... but worse yet plotting against "Obama Enemies" by using that over used racist label. Have seen that tactic even here on the forums. It will be interested to see how some of my fellow posters justify this group, respond, and defend this group... if interested you can read some of their shared emails on The Daily Caller. Just google it.
 
Last edited:

sarawind

Beach Fanatic
Jul 9, 2005
582
61
30A
Political hacks pretending to be journalists.


The Smoking Gun For Media Bias
?
Journo-Gate: For decades, moderates and conservatives have been derided and ridiculed for complaining about the mainstream media's pervasive liberal bias. As it turns out, however, their worst fears were true.

If you don't know about Journolist, you should. It's a semi-secret listserv maintained by Washington Post columnist Ezra Klein. Don't bother to try to log on. If they want you, they'll ask you to take part. No outsiders need apply.

And who uses it? Almost exclusively liberal journalists and left-leaning movers and shakers. Sound innocuous? It isn't.

Journolist has become a forum for lefty journalists to talk about how to push their progressive agenda on America, protect President Obama and hurt his foes. It is a safe-space for the often-vile expression of hatred toward conservatives and their ideas.

It all came to light a few weeks ago when news broke that then-Washington Post writer David Weigel, hired to cover the conservative movement for the Post, had made disparaging comments about those he covered on Journolist.

Weigel's remarks were bad enough. But in the ensuing weeks, other comments emerged that made it clear his comments weren't atypical. Not only do the liberal journalists despise conservatives and their non-progressive vision for America, but they actively colluded ? one might say plotted ? to undercut them.

This isn't journalism. It's political activism.

What's disappointing is not just the lie that journalists put forth about being "objective." That's long since been proved false by survey after survey showing that members of the media are not only overwhelmingly Democratic in their political orientation but also far to the left of average Americans on virtually every major social and economic issue, from tax cuts to abortion.
No, the biggest disappointment is the nastiness they appear to harbor toward right-leaning journalist colleagues.

During the 2008 debate over the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, President Obama's personal pastor who repeatedly expressed his contempt for America in shockingly racist terms, some on Journolist suggested ways to squelch coverage. As Spencer Ackerman of the inaptly named Washington Independent suggested, "What is necessary is to raise the cost on the right of going after the left.

... Take one of them ? Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares ? and call them racists."
When ABC News' Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos dared to ask Obama about his longtime ties to Wright, Richard Kim of the Nation called Stephanopoulos a "disgusting little rat snake."
 

30ashopper

SoWal Insider
Apr 30, 2008
6,845
3,471
59
Right here!
I was curious when this would show up. Generally speaking, Ezra Klein and the journalists and bloggers who got involved in this were really quite stupid, they should have realized their private conversations would ultimately leak out. Overall though we already knew that the liberal media was, well, liberally biased, so this just helps to prove the point.

It is a little scary reading some of the things these folks are suggesting, but overall, it shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.
 

LuciferSam

Banned
Apr 26, 2008
4,749
1,069
Sowal
Now I understand why it appeared that Obama had the press in his pocket...not only in his pocket, but actual working for him, planning their reports talking points, agreeing to ignoring certain stories, even plotting take downs of other news group... but worse yet plotting against "Obama Enemies" by using that over used racist label. Have seen that tactic even here on the forums. It will be interested to see how some of my fellow posters justify this group, respond, and defend this group... if interested you can read some of their shared emails on The Daily Caller. Just google it.

I don't think I'll defend anything, but merely state that I'm totally unsympathetic to your cause whatever that might be.
 

sarawind

Beach Fanatic
Jul 9, 2005
582
61
30A
These journolists are writhing in agony over the Tea Party movement. For the first time since The American Revolution people throughout America are sick of this crap and don't intend to tolerate it any longer. All of the journolist plotting, race-baiting, lies and suppression of important stories are back-firing, finally, and they will get their just deserts and undo the democrat party along with them.
 

Will B

Moderator
Jan 5, 2006
4,564
1,318
Atlanta, GA
I'm sorry, but branding somebody a "racist", today, has the same effect as thumbing your nose and saying "nanny nanny boo boo". It is the most overused and misused label there is, now. I wish everybody was required to go back and learn what it truly means. I bet a lot of people would be shocked to see how the term has morphed into a catch all word that has lost most of its meaning...
 

sarawind

Beach Fanatic
Jul 9, 2005
582
61
30A
It is a little scary reading some of the things these folks are suggesting, but overall, it shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.

No surprise here. Figured this out when 150 "journolists" hot-footed it to Wasilla to dumpster dive through the Palin's garbage cans and not one went to Chicago.
 

LuciferSam

Banned
Apr 26, 2008
4,749
1,069
Sowal
I'm sorry, but branding somebody a "racist", today, has the same effect as thumbing your nose and saying "nanny nanny boo boo". It is the most overused and misused label there is, now. I wish everybody was required to go back and learn what it truly means. I bet a lot of people would be shocked to see how the term has morphed into a catch all word that has lost most of its meaning...

Racism is still with us. The problem with overusing it is you might not recognize it when it's staring you in the face.
 

Will B

Moderator
Jan 5, 2006
4,564
1,318
Atlanta, GA
Racism is still with us. The problem with overusing it is you might not recognize it when it's staring you in the face.

Yes, it is. I recognize it. I won't go into the details of my family's relationship with the King family (yes, THAT King family), but I stand firm in staying that the racist label has been bastardized to the point of being close to insignificant. People who throw it around use it because they know there is a perceived stigma attached to being labeled a racist, or they have no idea what it really means.
 
Not disagreeing with any of the racist word comments as we, as adults, have already been formed, and nothing will change bias opinions built into the person. I hate the word personally, and try to avoid using it although many on the forum tend to throw it out when they are at a lost as how to explain away another's comment. I have been reading the Journolist emails as they are being released. It is indeed sad that our news relayers, who many depended to get their news from, were being led like little non-thinking dupes down a road believing the garbage that these guys were spewing. The hate again Sarah and her family started right there in that pool of haters as soon as she appeared on the screen. I consider their actions a war on the American People, they were trying to fix the election. This last election has really tipped the scale as far as questionable practices...Acorn stuff, dead voters, bias media doing smear campaigns. Makes me wonder, was Obama really the right one.
 
Last edited:
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter