Please post what you have where Swalwell did anything wrong? He was informed and he cooperated unlike your hero who obstructed. trump even let a Chinese spy join Mar-a-Lardo.
Welcome to America
- Thread starter Leader of the Banned
- Start date
-
Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
- Status
The report that bigly and completely exonerated everyone like no one has ever seen?
I think you’re confusing it with the Mueller report where a total of thirty-four individuals and three companies were indicted by Mueller's investigators. Eight have pleaded guilty to or been convicted of felonies, including five Trump associates and campaign officials.
When you say wrong do you mean other then sleeping with a chinese spy? Do you know what the mathematical chances of a chinese spy sleeping with an American representative would be? Your boy was getting played.
You may want to research the Trump thing before you try to compare the 2, I don't want you to come off uneducated
and what did they plead guilty to?
Durham Report: Cliff Notes Version
The Durham report reveals that intel alleged that the Clinton campaign may have created the Russia narrative and fed it into the news media to distract the
www.wisconsinrightnow.com
Do you mean the mueller report where 40+ people that absolutely hated Trump worked for as long as they wanted with no budget to try to find anything on Trump and came up with nothing? That mueller report?
I forget what was Trump charged with at the end of that?
Maybe I missed it, help me out
You do know these answers are out there don’t you?
Here is Mueller’s statement on why he wasn’t charged.
"Based on Justice Department policy and principles of fairness, we decided we would not make a determination as to whether the President committed a crime. That was our decision then and it remains our decision today."
The Justice Department and The Office of Legal Counsel have a long-standing policy that prevents federal prosecutors from charging the president with a crime.
Here’s another Mueller quote.
"As set forth in the report, after that investigation, if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.”
Also, Jerold Nadler asked Mueller directly whether Donald Trump had been accurate to claim he was "exonerated" by the special counsel report, to which Mr Muller replied with an emphatic "No".
Last edited:
There's an assumption that they had sex something Swalwell denies.
Again, you think it's appropriate for someone to make death threats against a dually elected official?
The special counsel found that Russia did interfere with the election, but “did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”
As far as obstruction, the Mueller report laid out facts on both sides but did not reach a conclusion. Barr’s letter said that “the Special Counsel states that ‘while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.’”
This is leftist logic, so neither Trump not any of his people worked with the russians (even though the russians tried) but he may or may not have obstructed the investigation into whether he helped the russians, which mueller proved he didn't do. Clear as mud
Mueller finds no collusion with Russia, leaves obstruction question open
Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation did not find sufficient evidence that President Donald Trump’s campaign coordinated with Russia to influence the United States’ 2016 election and did not take a clear position on whether Trump obstructed justice.
When did I say it was OK for anyone to make death threats against anyone?
- Status