• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
New posts

Paula

Beach Fanatic
Jan 25, 2005
3,747
442
Michigan but someday in SoWal as well
Every place has multiple "true" stories going on simultaneously. The story told is one of those stories. The other "true" stories are the ones that have to do with people stopping by Seaside to get food at the market, walking through the streets, renting those bicycles and riding around the streets, enjoying the bookstore, families making memories, people learning to respect the power of Mother Nature and adapt to her, people enjoying the beauty and nature of the area, people enjoying sunset at Bud and Alley's, etc.

As for traffic, I have never been to the area during peak season (June - early August) but for the rest of the year, the lack of traffic is heavenly.
 

Travel2Much

Beach Lover
Jun 13, 2005
159
0
I think the article unjustifiably sensationalized the dune damage, but was dead-on right about the car issue. I stayed several times at Seaside over the years, even b/f the south side of 30A was developed (it was much much nicer then). There are two major, fundamental problems that impede it reaching its vision in my view, neither of which can be fixed:

1. The basic design totally ignores treatment for cars. And, what you have are SUVs lining the narrow streets. So, instead of relaxing on your front porch listening to the crickets or watching the children play in the street you are treated to someone's SUV in your front yard. Drove me absolutely nuts. They should limit the number of cars people can park to one, or ban cars entirely. The traffic on 30A is tight, but the cars on the side streets are incredibly unaesthetic. I don't want to spend 4k a week to stare at some person's Jeep Cherokee.

Watercolor initially designed around this problem, but caved in to the touristas and now have parking spots in the front of houses--right in front of those much talked about screened porches. Alys Beach from what I hear is doing it completely right--cars are going to be in walled group parking areas.

But, my view is that there should be a two car maximum for any unit, anywhere on 30A.

2. The second failure is that Seaside's vision contemplates a summer residential community, and now the vast majority are trasnsient weekly renters. Instead of greeting your loved neighbors back for the season year after year, your neighbors might be an LLC, and the people next door transients who blast the stereo too loud, whatever.

So, if you judge architecture by whether it attains its stated goals, Seaside has ultimately to be considered as a failure. I love its concept tho, and the design, and avail myself of the place as much as possible.
 

Santiago

Beach Fanatic
May 29, 2005
635
91
seagrove beach
Travel2Much said:
I think the article unjustifiably sensationalized the dune damage, but was dead-on right about the car issue. I stayed several times at Seaside over the years, even b/f the south side of 30A was developed (it was much much nicer then). There are two major, fundamental problems that impede it reaching its vision in my view, neither of which can be fixed:

1. The basic design totally ignores treatment for cars. And, what you have are SUVs lining the narrow streets. So, instead of relaxing on your front porch listening to the crickets or watching the children play in the street you are treated to someone's SUV in your front yard. Drove me absolutely nuts. They should limit the number of cars people can park to one, or ban cars entirely. The traffic on 30A is tight, but the cars on the side streets are incredibly unaesthetic. I don't want to spend 4k a week to stare at some person's Jeep Cherokee.

Watercolor initially designed around this problem, but caved in to the touristas and now have parking spots in the front of houses--right in front of those much talked about screened porches. Alys Beach from what I hear is doing it completely right--cars are going to be in walled group parking areas.

But, my view is that there should be a two car maximum for any unit, anywhere on 30A.

2. The second failure is that Seaside's vision contemplates a summer residential community, and now the vast majority are trasnsient weekly renters. Instead of greeting your loved neighbors back for the season year after year, your neighbors might be an LLC, and the people next door transients who blast the stereo too loud, whatever.

So, if you judge architecture by whether it attains its stated goals, Seaside has ultimately to be considered as a failure. I love its concept tho, and the design, and avail myself of the place as much as possible.
Robert Davis is quite a visionary but even he couldn't envision the changes that would happen to Seaside and the whole area in the past 25 years. It does not constitute failure that the area had so much appeal, that every yuppie in Atlanta with an SUV would want to spend a week here. By your definition, the only way that he could have succeeded would be for him to have frozen time, which consequently, would have frozen real estate values. Things evolve, sometimes for better, sometimes for worse, but they always evolve. I would say that somewhere along the way, Seasides goals changed also and I think that most people would consider it quite a success story.
 

landlord

Beach Lover
One observation on Seaside...

We own a house on 30-A and thoroughly enjoy it. When we bought it, it was on the rental program (which I was most unimpressed with). In any event, we promptly removed it from rental because the income was modest compared to the expense of the house and its value.
We stay at the house several weeks a year and let family and business friends stay there when we are not there.
I expect that the rental activity will diminish significantly over time because if you invest 3,4,5 million in your house, you don't need (or want) to subject yourself to the hassles of renting.
That being said, Seaside as a community will experience change (for the better) if this occurs and I would expect more people to be full-time residents (at least for much of the year).
 

Miss Kitty

Meow
Jun 10, 2005
47,017
1,131
69
Smiling JOe said:
I paid the author to write the story. :rotfl::funn:

hee hee hee...and that's maybe not a bad thing!!!!
 

DBOldford

Beach Fanatic
Jan 25, 2005
990
15
Napa Valley, CA
Living in CA, I would have to agree with Kurt about the traffic. What passes for congestion on 30A would be considered very minor here and in most urban areas. Must say that I love driving 30A at night during the winter months, when every place feels like a ghost town. I also agree that Seaside has been more of a success than otherwise. It isn't a community suited to everyone and all my childhood memories were connected more with Grayton. But it's interesting to consider how the South Walton beaches would have developed had Seaside and its excellence of design/performance standards not set the tone early on. I am so happy that Seaside distinguished our part of Florida as "Old Florida," because South Florida seems like a colony of Brooklyn to me. And without a Seaside, we might have seen far more highrise development like the unfortunate early strips in Blue Mountain and eastern Seagrove. We are also very happy with our investment in the house, but I would not look forward to a long-term engagement with rental property. That said, we have had our home on the rental program for four years now and have had damage only once during that time, all of which was acknowledged by the renter and paid in full. And in a couple of instances, had we not had renters in the house to report problems, we could have had a much more serious issue. So...all things in perspective.
 

Travel2Much

Beach Lover
Jun 13, 2005
159
0
Sure if Seaside's goal has changed to enhance real property value there and in the area then sure it is a success. Overwhelmingly. I think they have done a good job in giving great weight to the aesthetics (original goal) along with that, at least until recently. But, on pure aesthetics and functionality it is a failure.

The car problem (also trash pickup, too) was acknowledged by the planners a long time ago as a design error IIRC, and Rosemary Beach, planned out a few years later, was designed to try and avoid that problem. (I recollect this since I looked casually into Rosemary in the early 1990s and simply hate the problems at Seaside). Some success there, but not entirely. Alys, I think, has it absolutely right--make it architecturally impossible for people to litter their cars in the side streets and relegate them to hidden areas.

But, Seaside has never had the guts to tell the SUV driving, dollar bill waving Atlantan to park their car in some hidden lot that might involve a five minute walk and that might use highly valuable and saleable land. That's valuing bucks over architectural aesthetics, IMO.

All depends on what you use as the criterion for evaluating success.

I am really majorly wuvving Alys Beach as it goes up, as one might tell. Doesn't mean also I don't wuv Seaside.
 

Smiling JOe

SoWal Expert
Nov 18, 2004
31,648
1,773
Interesting comments. So how do you suggest that Seaside police itself and make everyone park their vehicles elsewhere? Also, where is the "parking lot property" you mention located?
 

Santiago

Beach Fanatic
May 29, 2005
635
91
seagrove beach
Travel2Much said:
Sure if Seaside's goal has changed to enhance real property value there and in the area then sure it is a success. Overwhelmingly. I think they have done a good job in giving great weight to the aesthetics (original goal) along with that, at least until recently. But, on pure aesthetics and functionality it is a failure.

The car problem (also trash pickup, too) was acknowledged by the planners a long time ago as a design error IIRC, and Rosemary Beach, planned out a few years later, was designed to try and avoid that problem. (I recollect this since I looked casually into Rosemary in the early 1990s and simply hate the problems at Seaside). Some success there, but not entirely. Alys, I think, has it absolutely right--make it architecturally impossible for people to litter their cars in the side streets and relegate them to hidden areas.

But, Seaside has never had the guts to tell the SUV driving, dollar bill waving Atlantan to park their car in some hidden lot that might involve a five minute walk and that might use highly valuable and saleable land. That's valuing bucks over architectural aesthetics, IMO.

All depends on what you use as the criterion for evaluating success.

I am really majorly wuvving Alys Beach as it goes up, as one might tell. Doesn't mean also I don't wuv Seaside.
I see what you are saying and here's to Alys trying to "get it right" but they will still have the same problems as Seaside and Rosemary Beach. As a property owner in RB, I can tell you that the carriage house parking behind most houses has not solved anything, maybe lessened it. People still like to drive and you can't get the Excursion into a carriage house spot very easily. At least they are thinking about it.
 

Travel2Much

Beach Lover
Jun 13, 2005
159
0
Santiago said:
I see what you are saying and here's to Alys trying to "get it right" but they will still have the same problems as Seaside and Rosemary Beach. As a property owner in RB, I can tell you that the carriage house parking behind most houses has not solved anything, maybe lessened it. People still like to drive and you can't get the Excursion into a carriage house spot very easily. At least they are thinking about it.

Right--RB was the next try, some successes but not a solution. I see it as an inherent problem with the New Urbanism, whiich has as one tenet ejecting people from their cars and getting them to walk, char with the neighbors, having self-sufficient communities, etc. BUT, people don't like to do that (particularly some short term renters). So, there is a constant battle between these two points.

Not saying that Seaside wasn't visionary, but like all Beta versions has some gliches. Every New Urbanist town in the area has wrestled with the problem. Watercolor, what I like to call faux New Urbanist, originally had a good idea--all parking was offstreet and carefully regulated. Then they caved and added those front parking spots. Alys Beach does seem to be adopting an interesting approach, which seems to be MAKING people do it.

Yeah SJ, a good New Urbanist would get the parking police and forceably separate people from their SUVs. For their own good and for the salvation of all mankind. Early on in Seaside there was enough held land in the back to maybe address the problem. Maybe not though. Given the original design, maybe they were always stuck with it. But to have been true to the vision the sacrifice should have been made (not saying that should have been done but that to be true to the vision it had to be done).

Good art, which includes architecture, is never well liked by most.
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter