
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/ap/20080116/twl-craig-appeal-1be00ca.html

Some day, a person mocking the ACLU will need them to protect their Constitution-given liberties. You may not agree with their choice of cases, but many people don't understand why the ACLU has a function in the first place. I used to be one of those people, so I know the mindset. It appears this thread is full of those people, so I won't bother to comment further.

Sometimes the cases the ACLU chooses to defend seem silly on the surface, but it is the underlying legal principle that we should all be concerned with protecting. Should you have an expectation of privacy in a public bathroom? Yes. That's why there are no windows and there are doors.
So, the ACLU has to defend this case because if they don't there is a legal precedent that people don't have the right to expect privacy in a bathroom stall. And then there will be nothing to stop airports or businesses from installing cameras in public restrooms.
So, Dr. Skunky and friends, I look forward to watching you take a dump on YouTube someday soon if the ACLU doesn't succeed in its bid to protect your privacy.:roll:
I am dying over here!!! dying!!!Where was the ACLU when the guy from Wham, George Michael, was caught in the airport bathroom, tapping his foot in the stall of an undercover officer? I guess since Michael pleaded no contest, then had the cop perform in Michael's new music video, all is okay.
You are welcome. Have fun on your date night! We will be at a remote, double-secret location.
actually, I think they should drop the entire case against the poor dumb pervert. I mean, they tricked the dude! not fair!
It was totally fair! They set a trap for people having sex in an airport bathroom and he was caught.
IMO his sexual preference and stance are his own business - I had no opinion or interest until a congressman started getting frisky in an airport's restroom. I would be just as offended if he had been caught soliciting a female prostitute in an AIRPORT BATHROOM.
At some point manners, class, and intelligence HAVE to come into play.
Elected official + infamous public sex site = scandal!

So punny scooterbug 
actually, I think they should drop the entire case against the poor dumb pervert. I mean, they tricked the dude! not fair!
however, I think this particular case is not worthy of aclu attention. it just gives people more ammo against them. its ridiculous. sex in a very public place is not acceptable.


The statute punishes “offensive, obscene or abusive language” which tends to arouse “alarm, anger or resentment” in others. Clearly, this law has the potential to ensnare and criminalize legal, constitutionally protected free speech, including solicitation for private sex.

Edited
I don't understand. How is sex solicitation* free speech?
*doesn't this mean sex for money, which is illegal?
How is this different from you asking to buy illegal drugs not being a free speech issue? I'd think the icky factor of sex in the next stall is comparable to not screaming "fire".
Sadly, I am not up on my airport public restroom sex legal statutes. I'm busy trying not to touch anything and catch my flight!
(unless I was smoking crack -- those people do some stupid things.)Regarding soliciting for sex, I've never heard of money not being involved in some way. You either have to pony up for a drink, dinner, diamond ring, or volunteer to pay for a babysitter and a mini-vacation.
True dat!Regarding soliciting for sex, I've never heard of money not being involved in some way. You either have to pony up for a drink, dinner, diamond ring, or volunteer to pay for a babysitter and a mini-vacation.
Edited
I'd like to hear from the first guy who has not paid, in some way, for sex.

I'd like to hear from the first guy who has not paid, in some way, for sex.
I'd like to hear from the first guy who has not paid, in some way, for sex.Does a six pack of Michelob count?
I'd like to hear from the first guy who has not paid, in some way, for sex.
Mr. Kitty has already gone to bed. Sorry.
The next ACLU case. 
You need to find some less mercenary women. We're not all posting price lists on the headboards! :roll:
C'mon SJ, be fair. We're not all hookers.
Does a six pack of Michelob count?
The headboard?! That's where I'm supposed to post my wishlist? No wonder I've not been getting the handbags and shoes that constitute my wages! :funn:Punzy, not all men expect a nice outfit, actually, we'd be happy if women were nekked. Tasteful makeup is fine, but not necessary. Attractive Haircuts? I've never seen a bad one on a lady. Highlights? I'm indifferent. Personal trainer/fitness regime is a good thing. Career? As long as she isn't working on the garbage truck (no offense to the ladies who are), I'm okay with whatever she chooses.
Dear baby Jesus, women have to pay in their own way. What man hasn't expected a nice outfit, tasteful make-up, attractive haircut, a few highlights, preferably a personal trainer or good fitness regime? Don't men put just as much emphasis on a woman's career when selecting a partner?
If we're making free market analogies here, doesn't the whole double standard come into play? We make womens' sexuality the more valuable commodity by limiting it.
C'mon SJ, be fair. We're not all hookers.
Please wait while we verify your forum account.