Countdown to Clinton's first real press conference

Yes, because she released them! I guess you're afraid of what trump's returns will reveal because many Republicans are demanding he release them simply because he said he would.

Ok great
What's the big deal on his returns? If he releases them great.

It's really only interesting if he has a lot of income coming from Russian or Chinese connections, but as long as he keeps it secret we can all just logically assume that it's quite damning. Logic is a beautiful thing.

It's really only interesting if he has a lot of income coming from Russian or Chinese connections, but as long as he keeps it secret we can all just logically assume that it's quite damning. Logic is a beautiful thing.

I've heard reports that he is under audit for many years going back?
I'm pretty sure if there was any damming info to be had...the IRS would have already leaked it to the Dems.

Just ran across this. An excerpt from an upcoming interview by Conservative talk show host Charlie Sykes about creating the rightwing's disregard for facts. There is language I couldn't edit so just click the link. It's brief.
Oliver Darcy on Twitter

I've heard reports that he is under audit for many years going back?
I'm pretty sure if there was any damming info to be had...the IRS would have already leaked it to the Dems.

He had no trouble releasing his returns that were under audit when he wanted to obtain a gaming license in NJ. Besides, he has plenty of returns that are not under audit, release those.

Just ran across this. An excerpt from an upcoming interview by Conservative talk show host Charlie Sykes about creating the rightwing's disregard for facts. There is language I couldn't edit so just click the link. It's brief.
Oliver Darcy on Twitter

Laughable.
Considering the left's nonstop bias for decades...and the revisionist history given to the .gov school students under the guise of "diversity".

He had no trouble releasing his returns that were under audit when he wanted to obtain a gaming license in NJ. Besides, he has plenty of returns that are not under audit, release those.

Ok. I have no problem with this. But I still don't care.

Greg Gutfeld explained today on Outnumbered how Donald Trump had won over the conservative base by repeating what he watched on Fox News.

I think immigration and terror and race and law and order has been the staple of Fox News for 10 years, all he did was watch Fox News.

But you care about Clinton's money. Kind of hypocritical. isn't it? Blind obedience is so charming...

Any btw...
Poor is not the problem. I grew up poor. Most of my family still is poor. I know plenty of poor people. But they still work hard and live with decency. Not the moral decay you see in our major cities. You know...the cities ran by DEMOCRATS for years...decades...multiple generations...

What are the Dems doing to improve the cities? they are against school choice. they want no judgment. no penalties for bad behavior. there is no push to make deadbeat fathers accountable. no incentive to keep families together. (actually the opposite, more welfare if you stay unmarried) but hey...they will try to legislate what you can eat and how large of a fountain soda you can buy. What a joke.

Keeping people poor while promising things like "trickle down economics" is what Republicans do best. "If you do without while making us richer, one day we will have our fill and our cup will runneth over and you too will share our spoils." And it still works.

It's the cities that are the problem. And you know it!

Why do you believe the Federal Government which is over the states is a problem but not state government that is over cities? Remember, it was the state of NC that got involved in a city's desire to treat everyone with dignity that created the transgender bathroom mess. And it was Arizona and over a dozen other states that passed laws barring cities from increasing minimum wages within their own boundaries.

But you care about Clinton's money. Kind of hypocritical. isn't it? Blind obedience is so charming...

Fool post.
I care about how Clinton "earned" her money because she's a politician. And what she may have done could put others in prison.

I don't care about how Trump earned his money because he's a businessman billionaire. And what he may have done would have put him in prison.

As a note:
I have no obedience to any politician, political party, or political idoligy.

Keeping people poor while promising things like "trickle down economics" is what Republicans do best. "If you do without while making us richer, one day we will have our fill and our cup will runneth over and you too will share our spoils." And it still works.

Puff...Puff...Pass...

Why do you believe the Federal Government which is over the states is a problem but not state government that is over cities? Remember, it was the state of NC that got involved in a city's desire to treat everyone with dignity that created the transgender bathroom mess. And it was Arizona and over a dozen other states that passed laws barring cities from increasing minimum wages within their own boundaries.

I'm good with the 10th amendment.

Fool post.
I care about how Clinton "earned" her money because she's a politician. And what she may have done could put others in prison.

I don't care about how Trump earned his money because he's a businessman billionaire. And what he may have done would have put him in prison.

As a note:
I have no obedience to any politician, political party, or political idoligy.

You say that but your words say otherwise. If anyone had started to read this forum I think they would thought you out to be a Republican apologists, I certainly did.

Fool post.
I care about how Clinton "earned" her money because she's a politician. And what she may have done could put others in prison.

I don't care about how Trump earned his money because he's a businessman billionaire. And what he may have done would have put him in prison.

As a note:
I have no obedience to any politician, political party, or political idoligy.

Trump is a politician now, so not wanting to know how he made his money is relevant, especially if he has financial ties to Russia and China. But you can stay willfully ignorant. It seems to be your style. You still haven't said who you are going to vote for, but it looks like your vote will be wasted anyway.

This is the way that a news conference should work and it now explains a whole lot
http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/trump-blames-bad-poll-numbers-on-existence-of-

You say that but your words say otherwise. If anyone had started to read this forum I think they would thought you out to be a Republican apologists, I certainly did.

That's what happens when it's assumed everyone fits a certain mold.

That's what happens when it's assumed everyone fits a certain mold.

Unfortunately not knowing you and just reading your words it would have been a pretty good assumption.

Many large businesses are under continual audit. The IRS always looks for money where they are most likely to find it. Many corporations have dedicated office space that is used for these continual audits. It would be unusual for Trump and/or his companies not to be under audit.

The growing power of the federal government is a problem because we as citizens cannot push back on that power very effectively as compared to our ability to effect change on local and state powers.

That's what happens when it's assumed everyone fits a certain mold.

Lars, the reason most people are on this site is to tell people their views and then back the views up with facts. You are just too mavericky for us. It's really just a simple question: who are you going to vote for?

Trump is a politician now, so not wanting to know how he made his money is relevant, especially if he has financial ties to Russia and China. But you can stay willfully ignorant. It seems to be your style. You still haven't said who you are going to vote for, but it looks like your vote will be wasted anyway.

Why must you be an ass?
Trump earned his money before entering the campaign.
Clinton earned her money as a politician.

Unfortunately not knowing you and just reading your words it would have been a pretty good assumption.

I fit no mold. I'm a Maverick.

Why must you be an ass?
Trump earned his money before entering the campaign.
Clinton earned her money as a politician.

So, the possibility of him having financial ties to Russia doesn't affect your acceptance of him as the preferable candidate?
Did you hear the latest about his campaign manager's ties to the pro-Russian Ukraine government, and how Trump's staffers managed to weaken the GOP platform provisions for helping to arms to the pro-western rebels in Ukraine? I guess financial disclosure isn't important if you dwell in willful ignorance.

My thought is that both candidates, a career politician and a career business mogul, have both figured out ways to work the system. I am sure most of it "legal", but also clearly some sketchy dealings and questionable decision making for both of them.

If their campaigns were movies, Clinton would be titled 50 Shades of Gray and Trump would be Pinocchio.

The reality is Trump has made such a caricature of himself and has no support in his own party, that Clinton has become the only choice.

Here is the info on the Clinton Foundation.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/foreign-governments-gave-millions-to-foundation

Contributor and Grantor Information