Welcome to America

I think one reason they took it down is because they thought you drunk posted and were trying to save you some embarrassment. Either that or your child signed on to your account.

Oh..is this a little campfire support group? Wrong on both assumptions Leader. No kids posted. Definitely was not drinking when posted. Nice try. Since you engaged, will you now post videos of white nationalism?

It's more about highlighting the leftist mantra: "Virtue is a cover for the sin".

I guess you are implying it's Trump's fault that blacks are beating up whites seeing as you think this thread is so appropriate for your post. I'm simply borrowing your powers of logic and reason, which from what I can tell, are non-existent.

Of course not. It's called "making do". It happens when the "staff member" who has to power of deletion exercises that power, nevermind that they get to post their faux "white nationalism" made up crap.

Blaming Trump (and George W before him) is the cop out for your team. How many of those blacks in that video do you think are Conservatives, Libertarians?

Of course not. Blaming Trump (and George W before him) is the cop out for your team. How many of those blacks in that video do you think are Conservatives, Libertarians?

I'm not the one blaming Trump, you are. You posted to this thread. There is no team. If there are many like you, tinfoil is a lucrative investment. For your own health and well-being, please get some sleep.

Oh..is this a little campfire support group? Wrong on both assumptions Leader. No kids posted. Definitely was not drinking when posted. Nice try. Since you engaged, will you now post videos of white nationalism?

It's more about highlighting the leftist mantra: "Virtue is a cover for the sin".

No, I won't post any such videos right now. Just Google "white nationalism". There is plenty to get your heart pounding with excitement. Here's the face of white nationalism. I'm sure he's been caught on video.

None of us know what the whistleblower story is truly about, but does anyone besides me have a gut feeling that Ukraine isn’t the real story? We all know Trump is a master liar and an expert at diversion.

Today IQ45 embarrasses himself at the U.N. by whining that he deserves the Nobel Prize for ”lots of things.”
He also claimed that when he became president* he “Took over the United States.”

Today Nancy Pelosi sealed Trumps re-election. I can't believe she caved in to the extreme left wing. I thought she was stronger and smarter. Apparently, I gave her credit where credit wasn't due. ROFLMAO!

Today Nancy Pelosi sealed Trumps re-election. I can't believe she caved in to the extreme left wing. I thought she was stronger and smarter. Apparently, I gave her credit where credit wasn't due. ROFLMAO!

I think it's mainly a matter if someone just keeps breaking the law, and the consequences are impacting national security, are you going to be political, or are you going to defend this country. If they can present enough compelling evidence, and force the Republican Senators to choose between money or treason, it is going to interesting if the cult can keep the Senate.

I think it's mainly a matter if someone just keeps breaking the law, and the consequences are impacting national security, are you going to be political, or are you going to defend this country. If they can present enough compelling evidence, and force the Republican Senators to choose between money or treason, it is going to interesting if the cult can keep the Senate.

What laws were broken?

Obstruction of Justice. Now, if you think this is just a petty rule, you ain't thinking too straight. This means he personally hid some evidence that would be important to determining if a crime was committed. It basically means that there were crimes committed and no one was punished for those crimes, doesn't it? The fact that he is concealing almost everything he is doing, and prohibiting everybody that ever worked for him from testifying before Congress, pretty much tells you that if they testify before Congress, under penalty of perjury, that they will not exonerate him. If you are innocent, you don't stonewall. Is that so hard to understand?

But just the fact that he is deploying ground troops to Saudi Arabia, to defend a country that sponsored the 9/11 attack ought to make you think a little bit about treason and aiding and abetting the enemy.

Today Nancy Pelosi sealed Trumps re-election. I can't believe she caved in to the extreme left wing. I thought she was stronger and smarter. Apparently, I gave her credit where credit wasn't due. ROFLMAO!

Impeaching Trump is an automatic decision at this point, if it wasn't a couple of months ago.

What laws were broken?

I don't think "laws broken" are necessarily the criteria. This is an informative link. Presidential Impeachment: The Legal Standard and Procedure - FindLaw

There are several interpretations of "high crimes and misdemeanors". One view is the following:

The fourth view is that an indictable crime is not required, but that the impeachable act or acts done by the President must in some way relate to his official duties. The bad act may or may not be a crime but it would be more serious than simply "maladministration." This view is buttressed in part by an analysis of the entire phrase "high crimes or misdemeanors" which seems to be a term of art speaking to a political connection for the bad act or acts. In order to impeach it would not be necessary for the act to be a crime, but not all crimes would be impeachable offenses.

In my opinion, using the power of the president and your personal attorney (Giulanni) to investigate a political opponent without going through (or at least informing) proper channels such as FBI and other intelligence agencies is an impeachable offense. Add to that the fact that the president is using his power and his voice to make unproven allegations of wrongdoing against the opponent and his son. That alone seals it for me. Never mind the fact that he pressured a foreign administrator of a non-ally, who he later states he suspected of corruption, to find incriminating evidence against the opponent. Also never mind the fact that he most likely withheld critical aid to this country that they needed to defend themselves against a hostile nation, whose dictator Trump is madly in love with. For the Democratic house to not go through with impeachment proceedings at this point would be a display of appalling weakness.

Even Steve Doocy...

Today Nancy Pelosi sealed Trumps re-election. I can't believe she caved in to the extreme left wing. I thought she was stronger and smarter. Apparently, I gave her credit where credit wasn't due. ROFLMAO!

All he had to do was simply release the complaint as the law requires, but instead being the ahole he is he had to make it a confrontation.

I have some serious questions. Does anyone believe that the Senate will find President Trump guilty and remove him from office? If he is not found guilty by the Senate, does anyone really think this hurts his reelection chances, especially with today's political climate? I was looking at the timeline of the Nixon years. I also looked at who owned the Senate during the Clinton impeachment years. Whether Speaker Pelosi truly did not want to impeach the President in the beginning, for which she seemed to take a lot of heat from her own party, or she was waiting for the right cause. I think either case is going to be difficult without a mass exodus of loyalist in the President's party. Just my opinion.

I have some serious questions. Does anyone believe that the Senate will find President Trump guilty and remove him from office? If he is not found guilty by the Senate, does anyone really think this hurts his reelection chances, especially with today's political climate? I was looking at the timeline of the Nixon years. I also looked at who owned the Senate during the Clinton impeachment years. Whether Speaker Pelosi truly did not want to impeach the President in the beginning, for which she seemed to take a lot of heat from her own party, or she was waiting for the right cause. I think either case is going to be difficult without a mass exodus of loyalist in the President's party. Just my opinion.

I don't think it helps his reelection chances. It will be a mark against him regardless of the Senate. He will also become unhinged like we've never seen. If Biden is the nominee, this will only help Biden.

I could be wrong about Nancy since it's just an inquiry.

If Pelosi didn't do it, she simply wouldn't be doing her sworn duty to defend this country from enemies both foreign and domestic. I think some Republican senators would certainly lose their seats after they voted to dismiss the charges.. Hell, some of them might be indicted as co-conspirators. Hope springs eternal! (Well, it use to, anyway.)

I have some serious questions. Does anyone believe that the Senate will find President Trump guilty and remove him from office? If he is not found guilty by the Senate, does anyone really think this hurts his reelection chances, especially with today's political climate? I was looking at the timeline of the Nixon years. I also looked at who owned the Senate during the Clinton impeachment years. Whether Speaker Pelosi truly did not want to impeach the President in the beginning, for which she seemed to take a lot of heat from her own party, or she was waiting for the right cause. I think either case is going to be difficult without a mass exodus of loyalist in the President's party. Just my opinion.

It's going to put a lot of pressure on GOP senators who have to defend the bastard.

I need to keep reminding myself that Nancy is just tending to her flock, plain and simple. She has her hands full. Not an easy task.

Something is up. The Dems have something beyond the Ukraine. If you look at Cyrus Vance and the state of NY. Marrero just announced that Trump does not have immunity in the request for his accounting and taxes because the demand for disclosure was prior to the election when he was still Citizen Trump. I think they are going to have multiple provable reasons to seek impeachment.

Something is up. The Dems have something beyond the Ukraine. If you look at Cyrus Vance and the state of NY. Marrero just announced that Trump does not have immunity in the request for his accounting and taxes because the demand for disclosure was prior to the election when he was still Citizen Trump. I think they are going to have multiple provable reasons to seek impeachment.

It could be nothing, but he brought this on himself by making everything a challenge instead of following norms pertaining to subpoenas and access to documents. No one can trust a transcript because we know he changes them.
As I have posted earlier and I may be wrong, but I don’t believe Ukraine is the whole story. What would be worse would be a scenario where he promised to turn over Browder or McCaul to Putin.

The Dem's have been barking at shadows since before he was elected Prez. They have zero credibility. If they had anything of substance on Trump it would be all over CNN.

One thing is for sure, the public will be subjected to an increase in presidential* gaslighting, bitching, whining, moaning, lying, self pity, etc, etc, etc, . . . . . . .

The Dem's have been barking at shadows since before he was elected Prez. They have zero credibility. If they had anything of substance on Trump it would be all over CNN.

Nothing of substance like his false accusations against Biden that are all over Fox? If there were something real he wouldn’t have sent his private citizen personal attorney to coerce a foreign ally to fabricate a crime.