• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
New posts

Rita

margarita brocolia
Dec 1, 2004
5,207
1,634
Dune Allen Beach
The photo you attached is 10" x 14" at 72 dpi. I think Minnie is right, your best bet might be to go to a kinko's and "test" one and see how large you can push it. I can make it any size you want, but since I'm not working from the original and it has been saved more than once, I wouldn't trust sending it away to do a large size print.

It is a very cute poster though ;-)

Kinko's is close. Do you think we can likely get an 18 x 24 from it? That would be big enough for sitting an easel I think.

.
 

ktschris

Beach Fanatic
Nov 18, 2004
1,877
150
62
St. Louis
Well the image will scale to 24" x 17.834 (urgh, more math) and that brings it down to about 42 dpi. It will work, I don't know what kind of output device photobucket uses, but a lot of the ink jet and laser printers out there are very forgiving of low dpi. It will help that the photo is suppose to be viewed from a distance, that will make it look better.

I also know people will think its wonderful no matter what. They will be looking at the subject matter and not the resolution of your image. I would go for it.
 

Rita

margarita brocolia
Dec 1, 2004
5,207
1,634
Dune Allen Beach
Well the image will scale to 24" x 17.834 (urgh, more math) and that brings it down to about 42 dpi. It will work, I don't know what kind of output device photobucket uses, but a lot of the ink jet and laser printers out there are very forgiving of low dpi. It will help that the photo is suppose to be viewed from a distance, that will make it look better.

It will just go from my desktop onto a thumb drive so will be like the original pic (except the original was color instead of B&W).

I also know people will think its wonderful no matter what. They will be looking at the subject matter and not the resolution of your image. I would go for it.

Right you are! We have a couple other ones we want to do also. I'll let you know how they turn out.


.
 

Smiling JOe

SoWal Expert
Nov 18, 2004
31,644
1,773
Key point is as KTChris states, it depends on the distance from which the poster will be viewed as to the clarity. At close range, within a couple of feet, a 72dpi pic will look a little fuzzy, but step back to view from five feet, and it is likely that your eyes will detect only a clear image.

I learned from BR and Kurt a while back, that when reducing size of photos, due to the screwy algorithms, you can sharpen the image to get a crisp photo, and bypass all of the stepping down bit by bit. Before that, I never understood why my reduced pics were so fuzzy. Thanks, BR and Kurt!
 

Rita

margarita brocolia
Dec 1, 2004
5,207
1,634
Dune Allen Beach
Well the image will scale to 24" x 17.834 (urgh, more math) and that brings it down to about 42 dpi. It will work, I don't know what kind of output device photobucket uses, but a lot of the ink jet and laser printers out there are very forgiving of low dpi. It will help that the photo is suppose to be viewed from a distance, that will make it look better.

I also know people will think its wonderful no matter what. They will be looking at the subject matter and not the resolution of your image. I would go for it.

ktschris,

One is done and it turned out nice! We'll get the other 2 done soon. Used FedexKinko's for this one but were quoted one price and it ended up $13 more. Difference between regular paper and photo paper. They were good about giving us the quoted price on that one. But we're planning to get the other 2 done at Staples. (Gotta stay within that Band Booster budget you know!)

Here's the pic. Jackie did it in B&W and photoshopped the tinting.

redAPRIL-calendar_1.jpg




.
 
Last edited:
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter