The Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act of 2009 (H.R. 1728) was introduced March 26 by coauthors Rep. Brad Miller (D-N.C.), Rep. Melvin Watt (D-N.C.) and Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee. It is expected to move quickly through the House this month and go to the Senate by May. The odds of passage in some form are high, according to banking and housing industry lobbyists.
*Ban all fees paid to loan officers that are tied to the interest rate of the mortgage or the type of the loan. During the headiest years of the boom, Wall Street investment banks paid mortgage brokers higher fees if they originated exotic loans such as short-term subprime adjustable-rate, interest-only, payment-option and "stated income" no-documentation loans with minimal or no down payments.
*Create mandatory minimum national quality standards for all mortgages. The rules would encourage lenders to make fully documented 30-year, fixed-rate loans with prevailing market rates, as opposed to loans with higher-risk features such as adjustable payments and negative amortization.
*The bill would also impose a federal "duty of care" standard requiring loan officers to offer applicants terms and rates that are "appropriate" to their income and ability to repay.
*Refinancings would have to pass a "net tangible benefit" test demonstrating that the replacement loan is superior to the borrower's current terms.
*Lenders would have to offer applicants the option to choose any loan without a prepayment penalty attached.
*Mandatory arbitration clauses in most mortgages would be banned.
*Allow borrowers who are put into mortgages that violate the new law to seek legal redress through cancellation of the loan contract, refund of all payments and fees and compensation for legal costs.
More from Bloomberg and the L.A. Times -
Repayment Risk Shifts Back to Mortgage Lenders Under House Bill - Bloomberg.com
Bill would fundamentally reform home mortgage industry - Los Angeles Times
Maybe some of the lending experts here can decode the meaning of all this as a lot of it is greek to me. In general though, it sounds like heavy restrictions on who banks can lend to and what types of loans they can offer are coming. Personally I'm against stuff like this because in the end government ends up restricting the rights of those that make good decisions to protect those that don't. I wonder what impact this will have on real estate in general over the next couple years once it passes.