BeachSiO2
Beach Fanatic
bchsio2, I'm not referring only to earmarks. How about the money spent in the IRS, war on drugs, and the money spent on rebuilding countries which we blow up, and the act of blowing them up in the first place? Why not invest that money (oh that's right, it isn't even our money. We are borrowing it from the middle east and China!) on bettering our own country, and letting the People make up their own minds on how they would like to FREELY spend their earnings?
I agree with all of the above, but these are the yearly appropriations bills, not supplemental bills or military or military construction. The military is funded through the non-discretionary side of the budget, which encompasses over two-thirds of the overall budget. While there should be a prioritizing of what programs should be involved in, not passing any discretionary appropriations bills is not the right idea either.
Last edited:



Toots, CAGW is not biased. Nancy Pelosi is. My definition of 'doing something' is derailing impending budget disaster. Pelosi's leadership leaves much to be desired. Effective leaders can accomplish tasks working with the opposition-Reagan did it, why can't Pelosi? I think it speaks volumes that she put out a book a few weeks ago, made the inevitable tour of the talk shows hawking it yet it isn't selling and it is already in the bargain bin. She is not an inspirational nor effective leader.