On the day I locked, lenders repriced several times. According to my broker, Chase offered the best deal on a 7/1 IO ARM, so I told him to lock me in. After I was locked, I asked him to disclose the YSP. He said, and disclosed on the GFE, that Chase was paying 1 point on my loan of roughly $600K. I told him I was only willing to pay him $3K out of YSP for doing the deal, but he negotiated me upward slightly. He applied the remaining YSP toward my closing costs and I signed the documents.
As far as Paulson's plan goes, it only applies to subprime borrowers, of which, I am not one. However, if I was a subprime borrower, it sure would feel good to know I could get bailed out if my investment didn't turn out as expected.
Little Fish
This is where I take issue with your transaction. Why didn't you at application make it clear what you were willing to pay or what you felt was justified income to the Broker? You could have signed a Broker Fee Agreement stating you wanted to only pay $3000 in Broker Fee and ask for 0 to be put for YSP. You could have shopped the rate to see if you could get a lower rate where their YSP would have been .50 point. I'm betting you had already done that and got kicked to the curb by other Brokers. If your loan was already in process when you locked, you wasted your time and your Brokers by not being forthright, but probably at that point decided he had already invested enough time on you, give you what you ask so he could move on to the next loan. So who was playing the game here? It worked out for both of y'all in the end you claim, but I can tell you 1 point is not unreasonable in this credit environment to get an interest only investment property through underwriting when Banks are foreclosing by leaps and bounds on past speculators, yet you have tried to insinuate that Brokers are raping their clients with YSP.
What about the guy who is looking to buy his first primary residence, only has 10% and is slightly short of closing costs. Wouldn't YSP be a way a Broker could help him get into a house if he qualifies from a debt ratio standpoint? I am sure you don't care though based on your last statement regarding bailout.
Last edited: