If I understand you correctly you think that there are more pressing issues or 'bigger fish to fry'. I disagree.
When I lived in New Orleans I heard the same opinion voiced whenever somebody tried to change an ordinance or get a variance regarding signage, trash receptacles, buildings or what have you in the French Quarter and an uproar ensued. Indeed, New Orleans has many problems of larger scale than signage, however, there are some citizens who recognize that the French Quarter is a treasure that must be preserved, and they would go through legal war to accomplish this. And it makes sense;people come from all over the world to step back in time-it can only be done in a few square blocks in New Orleans, not Orlando, Las Vegas or any other mecca of bad taste. People will pay money for that experience! And, I must add that there are no wayfinding signs in the Quarter, but maps are free in any hotel;the tourists seem to get where they are going.
I don't know if we yet have international visitors coming to 30-A to enjoy the scenic, unspoiled character, but rest assured, we will. To spoil the greatest asset belonging to 'The Beaches of South Walton' by those who are trying to market the area is awfully short sighted. I envision a time 30 years forward when 30-A still looks like 30-A, and HWY 98 is one strip mall and gas station after another from Panama City to Fort Walton! That day will come and we need to be ready to offer an unspoiled, relaxing destination for visitors and locals alike to enjoy. That is why we need to fight this first little bit of blight on 30A with full force now! Those big blue signs set a precedent that big signs are tolerable. And they are not. Neither are unilateral decisions on the TDC's part.
If 30-A is one big bundle of clutter, what then will make it any more of a desirable destination than Destin, Panama City or Clearwater? The logic of erecting the signs in an effort to draw distinction between 'The Beaches of South Walton' and 'Destin' (a stated goal by one of the TDC members) is obviously flawed when the signage will do nothing but narrow the clutter gap that seperates the two.
The debate is not just about the signs-it is about the long term viablility of 30-A as a true escape from the Disnification of the state and country in general.
If you suggest that there are larger issues than preserving 30-A for both visitors and those of us who have put down roots here, I am all ears.
Amen Skunkape Very insightful and forward thinking; we must do all we can to preserve all of what makes Scenic 30-A special; not only for our visitors but for our residents.
