So in Pa. the Catholic vote went to Clinton 71% to 29% for Obama.
That my friends is the Tsunami that I have been predicting with this thread.
Given the fact that there are more than 60 million Catholics in the country I think you'll agree that this doesn't bode well for the Dems.
I'm thinking that Obama will have a very poor showing in Nov. and take the ticket down with him.
Mitt will run in 2012 and again in 2016 so that gives you donkeys till 2020 to figure out a better way to select a candidate.
I would suggest doing away with caucuses which skew the result to the radical wing.
Without verifying the numbers- I agree that your prediction on where the catholic vote would go in PA rang true. I'm just not convinced that it will amount to a wave- let alone a "tsuanami"...
What percentage of total voters are catholic? I would venture to guess that this is a minority relative to the numbers associated with other key demographics in this race (e.g. gender, race, age, etc.)
I don't know the data to say for sure. But hypothetically, let's say that the percentage of the total voters who are catholics is relatively small. Now let's say that most of them are of a higher age bracket. My understanding is that it is known that folks in the higher age brackets would not have voted for Obama anyway. So there was no damage done by catholics on top of what was already done based on the age demographic...
Set me straight.
BTW- it is nice to see some unemotional discourse and debate lately. As such, I am reengaged in the political threads...
Cheers, GW
