The US is a nation of immigrants ergo we have a mix of cultural and racial backgrounds which can adversely affect the above statistics. We also have cultural norms that contribute to poor health, and I am sad to say, Southern cooking with lard and fatback are good examples. Such lifestyle characteristics can be measured in mortality tables and the like but it does not measure the quality of healthcare.
I spent some time at Emory and you see folks from all over the world with serious conditions. They are in the US, not Sweden, Canada or the UK.
My question is still the same. What are you basing your claim of "best healthcare in the world" on? If you are only counting the care available to the wealthiest percentage of the population, then comparing that to the similar cohort in other countries would most likely still not make us the best healthcare in the world.
We may have the most treatment options for the sick but our preventive care is abysmal compared to the rest of the western world. Access to care is a big part of this. I will agree that lack of education , poverty, and personal apathy are factors in not utilizing good preventive care. It never ceases to amaze me how a little prevention would save so much money and lives later on.
Take heart disease, the number one killer in this country. Simple access to weight management therapy, smoking cessation therapy, cholesterol lowering medications, and BP medications would have a huge impact on health. Instead of paying $100000 for treatment of an MI , society could invest $3-4000 in preventive care and get the same results. This is the real reason we lag behind countries with universal health care, IMHO.
We need health care for everyone in this country. I dont care if the private sector or the government or some combination of the two provide it. We all pay for it in the long run and we are choosing the most expensive and inefficient way possible to get it.