And remember vp deal is strange at best. JFK picked Johnson and he couldn't stand him.Thank you for explaining yourself.
Does there need to be another reason? The RWC's sealed the deal for Bush in the last election.
I really thought you got the answer you've been seeking a few days ago....
Honestly, I do think Palin was chosen to appease the right wing conservatives. IMO, they feel they have an unspoken agreement with Palin on the issues. As long as she is a Christian (one of us) and looks to God in all aspects of her decisions then all will be well and good. It's as simple as that.
Personally, I was more turned on by McCain's speech than Palin's. I lean right of center but I didn't care for the jabs at Obama or the air of arrogance. I was talking to Mr OL about the speech and just as Miss Kitty mentioned above, he said the VP's are just the bulldogs of the race....that's their job. I keep thinking about our current VP and past VP's and I'm not sure I've ever really given them much thought. I don't even know what they've done other than get shot and invent the internet.![]()
I think your observations are spot on OL!This is very interesting. Last night the VP nominee denigrated community organizers and Senator Obama and the people he helped in Chicago.
Tonight, John McCain asks the party and the country to go out and "feed a hungry child, teach an illererate person to read, get involved to make a difference."
The very things that community organizers do, and are so effective at!
McCain separated himself from the Republican administration of Bush; and brought Palin in as the heiress to the Bush idealogy....No wonder it is hard to explain/put into words what there is to like about this team.
Gives a new definition to the term "split ticket"
Well, we didn't hear Obama mock Palin's resume in any way like the Republicans did all night long. He could have very well spoke about his degrees, one degree from Columbia in Political Science with a specialization in international relations, plus another degree from Harvard, in law. While there, he was president of the law review. Palin took Journalism in Idaho. Idaho.
He also didn't compare his many substantial legislative achievements and him vs. her as far as being a "Reformer". * Ethics Reform: Obama was the Senate's point person on ethics reform, and sponsored or co-sponsored the bills that made up what the Washington Post called "the strongest ethics legislation to emerge from Congress yet.
I can go on and on, but I don't think his answer was out of line vs. her calling him just a Community Organizer and the crowd yelling ZERO, in lieu of hearing on where she stands on issues.
And your mocking of a journalism degree from Idaho points out another reason why I like her. I am tired of ivy league elites running our government. (the last non-ivy league pres was Reagan.)


Obama has plenty of surrogates in the media as well as people like Bill Maher to mock Palin for him.And your mocking of a journalism degree from Idaho points out another reason why I like her. I am tired of ivy league elites running our government. (the last non-ivy league pres was Reagan.)
Judging by how some of our media do their job they need a journalism degree.![]()
I am not mocking Palin's education. Some of the most accomplished, and when I say accomplished, I also mean happy people, those who help others, live a respectable life, are non-degreed individuals with much common sense. I was simply pointing out that in contrast to the bashing Obama received at the RNC, his comment was not denigrating. IMHO.
Looking at McCain, the first thought that comes to mind is "is this the best we can do". JMac looks like a 50 percent shot to keel over in office, and that leads me directly to Palin and the wisdom of that pandering choice. With Obama, it's all show and little go, he is short on much beyond academic accomplishment, between his Chicago buddies and his past church you have the makings of a carnival and his Senator-for life running mate looks to be the GM of a Toyota dealership. Our country is in a bad way!