I was absolutely appalled by the recent US Weekly issue and its treatment of Bristol Palin. (I read the piece on Obama's family so I read the one on Palin to be fair) Even given some of the other crap they print and the credibility level of the magazine I don't know HOW they can't be sued.
There is definitely something sketchy about Palin's last baby/pregnancy, but since Bristol was already pregnant w/ her current baby when it was delivered it's rather obviously not hers - making the scurrilous article, innuendo, and a purported picture of poor Bristol 'looking pregnant' completely unacceptable on so many levels. (BTW if Bristol is "pregnant" in that picture most American women are having twins).
I think we need some laws (or if we have one, enforce it) or regulations or something that make anyone under 18 off limits to the press/paparazzi. We already regulate child labor, I think child press is a good next step!
There is definitely something sketchy about Palin's last baby/pregnancy, but since Bristol was already pregnant w/ her current baby when it was delivered it's rather obviously not hers - making the scurrilous article, innuendo, and a purported picture of poor Bristol 'looking pregnant' completely unacceptable on so many levels. (BTW if Bristol is "pregnant" in that picture most American women are having twins).
I think we need some laws (or if we have one, enforce it) or regulations or something that make anyone under 18 off limits to the press/paparazzi. We already regulate child labor, I think child press is a good next step!


