It seems to me that a meaningful discussion of the relative merits of healthcare systems has to be isolated to yield productive results. News today is littered with stories describing the US healthcare system as broken, backwards and/or expensive. It is expensive and one reason is our tort system. Our system is unique in the world so maybe tort reform is a good starting point. Physicians are forced to practice defensive medicine. You know, let's get an MRI just to be sure. Lobbyists have been battling this since the beginning of my career as an underwriter. Tort reform is needed here for frivolous cases absolutely, but most of Congress is a JD? And, litigants are encouraged to settle out of court for insurance limits.....driving the malpractice premiums for physicians and hospitals higher and higher.
Speaking of MRI's, several months ago I posted the mean wait times to get an MRI in Canada and Sweden, two countries normally thought to provide excellent universal healthcare. The wait times were a few months and were published by the governments in those countries not some right-wing fringe organizaiton.
Your friend thinks the UK system beats the US system hands down? Consider the below-linked article. It is published by the Leftist BBC. A woman is told to get an MRI and learns the wait time is eighteen months. I would go somewhere else and get my MRI, if I was this woman. But, she probably can't afford it because she is too dependent on their socialized system. What a shame! A few years ago, I was told to get an MRI; got one the next day with the latest greatest state-of-the-art machine. There is another reason why our healthcare costs are high: we have the latest in availability and technology. GE is a manufacturer of this type of medical equipment. A few years ago a new MRI machine had a price tag well over $5MM US.
![]()
