Simple. You stayed in too long.Full disclosure- I ran to the water, swam all day with the locals and now I'm drowning.
Simple. You stayed in too long.Full disclosure- I ran to the water, swam all day with the locals and now I'm drowning.
No Sir never stated or implied that.
Tarp was massive bailout 1 and it went to we all know who. The stimulus was another massive bailout and what has gone out has mainly been to state and local governments.
Only a tiny fraction of any bailout has gone to an individual property owner/mortgagee in the form of a legitimate modification.
Those former property mortagee's the subject of the article will lose, their home all their downpayments, fees to banks and taxes, monthly mtg. payments, equity, credit rating.
I-banks win initial fees and charges, bailout cash, the hard asset to sell again, zero interest borrowing, and future bailouts unnamed and several times as large as the tarp.
On a scale of 1 to infinity i don't hold much anomosity toward....guess who?
Fair enough. Let me ask you this-
If one bets and loses and in the process of trying to stick it out ends up losing everything including their ability to pay their mortgage-
What do you believe should happen next?
Yeah I adressed that a couple of posts earlier. I made that logical conclusion, because I think some people do feel that way.

Fair enough. Let me ask you this-
If one bets and loses and in the process of trying to stick it out ends up losing everything including their ability to pay their mortgage-
What do you believe should happen next?
Am I correct in that you chose not to own, but rather to rent?


They stop paying, the bank forecloses, they lose everything they've invested, and the house.
(actually, I guess they've already lost everything they've invested to the downturn in the market, so they end up losing the house as well, and get stuck with a rotten credit score taboot for seven years. Totally sucks.)
This all sounds very reasonable to me. I guess I had the impression that folks wanted more blood.
One thing I don't understand with all the talk of "upside down" and "walking away". If you are upside down in your primary residence and the estimated value is expected to rebound long before your mortgage is due to be paid off, why does it matter so much?
Aren't you just saving on taxes w/ a lower assessment in the meantime?
Are people just fixated on the supposed value of their "asset" when it is really a roof over their head.
Or I am just missing the point because the Scooterbug clan tends to stay in houses for decades/generations?