No, not necessarily just that. Its also called "print more money so that you can spend more and buy less". The Fed is at it again.
Otherwise known as inflation...
No, not necessarily just that. Its also called "print more money so that you can spend more and buy less". The Fed is at it again.
Otherwise known as inflation...
...better yet,continue to keep their heads buried in the sand and choose to ignore the obvious.Its too bad so many others do not realize what is really happening.
Ahh yes,very interesting that YOU brought up impeachment.I'm sure that you've never benefited from the educational system "you are paying for" ever right? I don't have children either, but I understand that an educated populace is better for all.
I see you're laying the ground work for the impeachment push we can all look forward to on November 3rd?

Thanks for posting.What I gathered from the read was the "statute of Limitations of blaming Bush" has been met.I also believe he is finally realizing the true importance of taking responsibility,albeit 2 weeks before the elections,it is a sign of the president maturing in a sense before our eyes(presidentially speaking).
Great, then we can agree that Bill Clinton was in fact responsible for the largest economic growth since the 1950's despite have a republican controlled congress.
And I will refer you back up to post number 7...
but with a twist...
The Dems had control for the first two years of Clinton's administration. After Clinton's no so great first term and the Dem's implosion, he learned to play nice or risk losing
re-election, and a lot got done with a Republican controlled congress.
So, yes, jobs created but by a Republican controlled congress.
Clear as mud, huh?