Yes I would.It has never been a good situation. Some problems can't be solved. Anybody want to put a moratorium on all development? I didn't think so.
Yes I would.It has never been a good situation. Some problems can't be solved. Anybody want to put a moratorium on all development? I didn't think so.
I think it's more about them wanting to put a bigger house on their lot. I don't have one second of sympathy for someone who levels dunes to build. Or anyone who buys a house where there was once a dune.The complications of moving the bike path to the south were fairly extreme. And, in all honesty, I really have a lot of sympathy for the people who own property on the south side. Many of these people bought their piece of heaven in the fifties, and have had their property chipped away by hurricanes and development ever since.
That being said, my thoughts still lean towards re-routing the bike path down Grove Street, or creating a grand, showpiece flyover bike and pedestrian bridge. The Gateway to 30-A! Just dreaming...
Respectfully, your line of reasoning is what has ruined our natural ecology (except areas protected by the state). On the emerald coast anything fronting the beach is part of a dune system. Almost everywhere, we have allowed building too close to the gulf, ruining the system and our enjoyment of nature. Our ecosystem has been taken away from us, the beach is being taken from us. But that's not enough for the greedy. Now our right of ways are being taken from us. Just look at all the illegal no parking signs popping up in our area on our right of ways.Mike, the houses in question did not level any dunes. They were built on the natural bluff. They have been there for over fifty years. They have been incredibly gracious to the natural environment. You do realize the bike path is on the north side from approximately whiskey bravo to watercolor. Were you proposing to re-route in through the entirety of Seagrove and Seaside?
EBSCO >< Stephens, Haring, et al >< ViridianMike, I've been visiting Seagrove since 1957, and those 5 houses in Seagrove did nothing to destroy the ecosystem. A lot of what has transpired since then has done damage. Is this those people's fault? Those families have tried to preserve the nature of Seagrove more than anybody. By the way, they had no involvement with the Viridian, and this deal will help insure that the north east sector of that intersection remains the Grove for which this town is named.
I think it would have to be extremely long to make it so it wasn't too steep to bike it.I was joking, earlier, about drones. I'm not joking about the suggestion of a bike path fly-over. It could be beautiful. It could be a graceful focal point, a gateway to 30-A. It could be a graceful concrete arch, but it, perhaps, could be dressed out in timber, a symbol of Seagrove. We have outstanding, local, architects who should latch on to this concept. My two cents.