Is it safe to assume you are all about "customary use"?
How can you assume you know what land Dawn, or myself, are referring to?
The only reason there is preservation land, state forest land, is because the state preserved it. The county would love to confiscate those lands. Heck, they keep ordering $600,000 studies to "study" dissecting state forest for a St. Joe-ordered thoroughfare connecting 30A to the Hwy 98 Test Track.
Further, I don't know the details, but I know its a miracle that Topsail Preserve even exists.
Is it safe to assume you'll be condescending in all of your replies?
Our state forest only exists because a developer went bankrupt after purchasing the land from the St. Joe Paper company, it's why you see their concrete property markers on state lands.
When that land went up for foreclosure auction it was purchased and then given to the state. Topsail state preserve was given that unique distinction as the land from western end of 30A extending east had never been cleared or forested so is in fact original scrub that is hundreds, if not thousands of years old.
Regarding the road through the state forest, you can thank local "environmentalist" Dave Rauschkalb who kicked off and has spearheaded this effort. I 100% oppose the forest road.
The original post incorrectly stated that JOE was careful and never clear cut. This is simply not true. Every lot in WaterColor, Watersound and the Retreat that has a home on it was clear cut to the lot lines, however JOE required replanting after construction.
The original post also never really clarified what it is in reference to.