Welcome to America

So I assume you are a Constitution hating left winger?

Question for Leader of the Lakeview Poppas: Do you want to know the name of the "first whistleblower" or does it even matter? I ask because a major component of dealing with LEGITIMATE whistleblowers is "Employee retaliation". Legitimate whistleblowers are KNOWN want to know they are protected from retaliation, and they are protected within the whistleblower guidelines.

I certainly understand why you guys don't want to know who it is/was. Just like who cares who the actual "Russian agents" are/were. It's just get Trump no what the means or the methods, right?

So I assume you are a Constitution hating left winger?

So I assume you are a Constitution hating left winger?

Abuse of power and bribery is what that the Ukraine case is all about. You could call it extortion, also. Mulvaney, Pompeo, and at least eight more national security officials are potential co-conspirators, unless they come clean with the full transcript of the phone call. Obstruction of justice applies to anyone who is not forthcoming with documents or testimony to this case. Guiliani is pretty well guilty of at least that, and probably a whole lot more. Campaign finance laws seem to have been broken pretty much everywhere along the line. As to the unilateral decision to withdraw US forces from a critical position in the war against Isis, that would be dereliction of duty, and since the people that gain the most in that situation are Russia, Isis, Syria, and Iran, I would say that is aiding and abetting the enemy, and just a hint of treason. Treason is actually debatable because technically you have to be in a real declared war for that to apply, but it can easily be seen as espionage, as well as the couple of times he has given away classified information to the Russians. Anybody remember that hilarious time he invited the Russian spy chief to the oval office? Then we have about ten instances of obstruction of justice from the Mueller Report (that the sitting president can't be indicted for) but that doesn't mean it can't be considered "high crimes and misdemeanors". I think the dereliction of duly, by not defending the constitution from all enemies foreign (Russia, Isis, Syria, Iran) and domestic ( himself and the Republican leadership) is the most salient potential charge. He has already called parts of the constitution phony, and has been violating the emoluments clause daily. In truth, he is virtual saturated in high crimes and misdemeanors.

Technically all that's required is one impeachable offense. The house has that more than covered, and they've got the votes. When it comes time for removal, there are a number of other things regarding Trump's lack of fitness that may not be impeachable offenses, but they won't be ignored and may provide Senators with the resolve to give him the boot.

Right now, it seems to be a battle to get the Repug Senators to grow a sense of right and wrong. A pretty tough row to hoe.

Abuse of power and bribery is what that the Ukraine case is all about.

Thank you. Although the relevant footage is from a recent Council on Foreign Relations summit, it is only RT that will continue to allow it to be shown. All US national media sources have hidden/deleted the footage. Why?

So to your point, yes: abuse of power (by Obama/Biden and bribery (to Ukrainian controllers) is what Ukraine case is about.


Would like to pivot to Russian corruption/collusion next? I have plenty of material there and you know, I cant find any pertaining to Trump. Neither could Mueller, and he had 12 rabid anti-Trumper attorneys on staff.

Thank you. Although the relevant footage is from a recent Council on Foreign Relations summit, it is only RT that will continue to allow it to be shown. All US national media sources have hidden/deleted the footage. Why?

So to your point, yes: abuse of power (by Obama/Biden and bribery (to Ukrainian controllers) is what Ukraine case is about.


Would like to pivot to Russian corruption/collusion next? I have plenty of material there and you know, I cant find any pertaining to Trump. Neither could Mueller, and he had 12 rabid anti-Trumper attorneys on staff.

The only thing that matters is the veracity of the information. The person came forward and the DNI determined the info was credible and so far the moron in Oval Office and his chief do staff have confirmed the allegations. The person is protected by law so why do you give a crap who it is?

Pay attention please: Biden, on behalf of the United States government, used foreign aid funds to convince the government of Ukraine to remove a prosecutor that was prosecuting a multi-national company where his son, Hunter, was on the board earning $50,000/month. Fixed it for you. ,

Thank you. Although the relevant footage is from a recent Council on Foreign Relations summit, it is only RT that will continue to allow it to be shown. All US national media sources have hidden/deleted the footage. Why?

So to your point, yes: abuse of power (by Obama/Biden and bribery (to Ukrainian controllers) is what Ukraine case is about.


Would like to pivot to Russian corruption/collusion next? I have plenty of material there and you know, I cant find any pertaining to Trump. Neither could Mueller, and he had 12 rabid anti-Trumper attorneys on staff.

basically cause him to go batshit crazy.

And...that's been the goal all along. And you found that you have a fighter. Keep hoping buddy.

And...that's been the goal all along. And you found that you have a fighter. Keep hoping ma'am.

You sure are stupid. Let me repeat: Biden was working for the US Government to remove a prosecutor who was NOT prosecuting corruption. You can use this clip as much as you want. it only reinforces the truth of the situation. Trump was not working for the US government. He was violating campaign finance laws.

He's already there, so any further deterioration is just icing on the cake.

I will be holding a major news conference in New York City with my children on December 15 to discuss the fact that I will be leaving my great business in total in order to fully focus on running the country in order to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
While I am not mandated to do this under the law, I feel it is visually important, as president, to in no way have a conflict of interest with my various businesses.”
Hence, legal documents are being crafted which take me completely out of business operations. The presidency is a far more important task.

We talked about it at great length last night," Mulvaney told "Fox News Sunday," adding that Trump "was honestly surprised at the level of pushback."
At the end of the day he still considers himself to be in the hospitality business and he saw an opportunity to take the biggest leaders from around the world and he wanted to put on the absolute best show, the best visit that he possibly could, and he was very comfortable doing that at Doral

Hey drifter stop altering the truth. It makes you look lame.