I didn't read the article, but I think it's a simple matter of we are damned whether we do or don't. We are screwed if we spend and screwed if we save, and we desperately need to do both for the good of the economy.
You're right and we as a nation will overreact as usual. Instead of seeking the middle ground (spend more wisely -vs- not spend at all).
It always amazes me how overboard we have to go on everything.
Banking is a good example. We had it tightly regulated (no interstate banks, no risky investments, etc.) That might have been too much regulation, but rather than try and moderate it, we got rid of almost all controls and the industry went apes**t. Now we overreact in the control direction and feel good about making banking too expensive for a sizable percentage of the population.
Our tendency to 3 strikes laws, zero tolerance, Sarbannes-Oxley, etc... are manifestations of this all or nothing approach. We seem to think that every time something bad happens, we need to legislate some reaction.
