I am taking a Diet Coke break from preparing for a very crucial public hearing tonight. My design team has been working on this project for four years and tonight is the big night. It is a 35-room historic inn, offering 22 units of affordable housing (built on-site), safety improvements on the highway, a complete historic restoration of the old mansion and grounds, and a half-million dollars each year in bed tax revenues. You'd think this would be a slam dunk, as they say. Not in our town. We are hanging in there by a swing vote. We have been on file and in hearings for a year and nine months, a prolonged stress test. In spite of losing quite a few brain cells in this process, I can still count to three. That's the number of votes I'm pretty sure we have tonight. Wish us luck!
FYI, this is the flip side of a community going too far in the opposite direction where tourism is concerned. A vocal minority refuses to accept reality, not very firmly tethered to Planet Earth. They want no tourists, no new hotel rooms, and no change...ever. We get a lot of walking wounded types here. Local planning director quote: "If we have hotels or inns here, people might want to come and visit." Like every person walking down Main Street isn't licking an ice cream cone and looking for the perfect tee-shirt, then driving back to their inn room about 10 miles away. (They don't allow sales of ice cream or tee-shirts on Main Street). Our General Plan actually calls tourists "transients" throughout the document. Very rude and small-minded. And the planners who write this stuff don't even live here and never have!
My husband is the voice of reason on the Planning Commission. We had to get our best buddy elected as Mayor for a reality check. I thought of this project as a great gift to the City, but after tonight, I am going to stick with planning/designing new wineries. We only have 368 in the Napa Valley now and we can always use another. :shock: If you put a winery there, might people want to visit it? Duhhhhh.
FYI, this is the flip side of a community going too far in the opposite direction where tourism is concerned. A vocal minority refuses to accept reality, not very firmly tethered to Planet Earth. They want no tourists, no new hotel rooms, and no change...ever. We get a lot of walking wounded types here. Local planning director quote: "If we have hotels or inns here, people might want to come and visit." Like every person walking down Main Street isn't licking an ice cream cone and looking for the perfect tee-shirt, then driving back to their inn room about 10 miles away. (They don't allow sales of ice cream or tee-shirts on Main Street). Our General Plan actually calls tourists "transients" throughout the document. Very rude and small-minded. And the planners who write this stuff don't even live here and never have!
My husband is the voice of reason on the Planning Commission. We had to get our best buddy elected as Mayor for a reality check. I thought of this project as a great gift to the City, but after tonight, I am going to stick with planning/designing new wineries. We only have 368 in the Napa Valley now and we can always use another. :shock: If you put a winery there, might people want to visit it? Duhhhhh.
