I am not sure what qualifies a person to have an opinion about someone else without facts yet that does not seem to stop people from having opinions. I am not sure what qualifies a person to be part of the "solution" unless you want to change your whole life and become a politician or a political activist. I believe opinions are okay if you are willing to make some attempt to look at both sides of an argument or another human and of course all humans have flaws and all arguments have two sides. Many of our flaws are revealed when money and power are involved. Our system of government is based on many principles but in my opinion the most important is checks and balances. If we ever lose sight of that principle then we will no longer have a balanced system of government and the results will be disasterous. What I see in the argument about these two people confirms that checks and balances are in place in our county government but it does not confirm anything else about the moral value of either person. People make mistakes and should pay for those mistakes but lets leave the moral judgement of people out of the debate. Maybe I am naive but I believe we are better humans when we treat those that disagree with us with respect. Life is a team sport!
Brannon Skewers Harris, will not run for re-election
- Thread starter Abby Prentiss
- Start date
-
Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
A disgruntled ex-employee who dislikes Suzanne and who risks charges of both slander and libel, neither of which is terribly likely to be filed due to the legal costs and the lack of resources from which a judgment could be recovered.
On the other hand, he may keep at it until she elects to sic her attorney on him despite the cost to her. She has demonstrated more than once her willingness to do what she believes right despite both the costs of doing so and the opprobrium heaped on her by many, including many on this forum, for standing up for what she sees as right. She suffers fools not lightly, and local 32550 is a fool if he thinks she doesn't know who he is.
Based on prior postings, even I could find his home address and a street view thereof in a minute or two, and he has posted his cell number online under local 32550 previously on Sowal. His degree field was not aerospatial engineering, and his hands are unclean.
Thanks lazin&drinkin, no response from local 32550 answering my question tells a lot about the allegations.
You know all Suzanne has to do is take a polygraph about her dealings. She has been asked to do so on a few occasions. She says she has transparency yet she spends 10's of thousands of dollars to avoid a polygraph. Suzanne just take one. If your telling the truth why not??
That is because Suzanne had him banned!! It says banned reason: no reason. She is even trying to mess with peoples rights to free speach because it makes her look bad!!