Thanks Seagrovegirl. I snooped around the Bay County official records site and found the documents pertaining to this lot.
"The Walton County website lists 5 closings in Watersound in August and Sept of 2007 and 23 closings in Aug and Sept of 2005. Looks like they are stretching the truth just a tad don't you think."
Fisher:
I agree with your comment above. The sales folks are doing their best to stress positives, while ignoring the overwhelming evidence that many owners in WS are nearing their pain threshold.
For example; some of these owners who purchased lots with 3 yr. interest only loans with balloon payments will have the loans come up for review by the banks. Banks will reappraise the properties and in some cases the appraised values will decline. Once this happens, owners will be forced to raise additional collateral to support the new loans. I perceive this will cause additional problems for cash strapped owners. (Obviously, not all lot owners are in this position, but my gut tells me there will be some.)
Additionally, I spoke with one owner who paid less that $500K for his lot near the beach. The vacant lot beside his has been flipped several times with the last owner paying roughly $1.5MM. Personally, I cannot see that owner making a profit anytime soon. I can only assume that either he paid cash and can wait it out for years to come, or the interest will be killing him in short order.
The sales rep I spoke with explained to me that the owners in WS are all wealthy; therefore, I will not see any distress sales. Oh really? If that is the Joe perspective, they are deluded.
I believe WS is the most beautiful development along 30-A and would like to become an owner when prices come back down to earth. When, and if I buy, I would be an end user, not an investor. End users are what Joe needs in this development. IMO, they should not have extended the buildouts as the market corrects all excesses. The extensions simply prolong the pain and prohibit the market from returning to normality.
Of course, this is all just my opinion, and is subject to revision from time to time. In the meantime, I'll be watching prices.
Little Fish
What do you consider "back down to earth"? IMO, you don't understand anything about the build-outs. If you force people to build who don't really care about the neighborhood, they will build absolute ****. Then, the most "beautiful development" on 30-A becomes a ****hole. But then I suppose you'll be able to afford it. Who's deluded?
Now that is a pretty narrow minded view. Let's take your argument and flip it. Why even have build out requirements in the first place? They serve as nothing more than smoke & mirrors as they become meaningless with extension upon extension. By extending them continuously, the flipper mania of a few years ago is only perpetuated.
Also, I don't think it's fair to owners who bought and who actually at some point plan to build (and have the means to do so) to have these extended. Especially since many of the sales people, and developers, used the build out times as an important tool when selling the lots/homes in the first place. These extensions only serve to promote empty subdivisions.
I suspect that when all this shakes out the majority of buyers facing problems are the ones who got left holding the bag and who had no intention of ever going vertical in the first place. Should these speculators be protected? I would say not, as they gambled on an investment and lost. Not much different than the stock market. I would much rather see the foreclosures occur in a shorter, more condensed timeframe and then for the the real buyers (i.e. people who will build) come in to start actually building these neighborhoods.
The construction of a home in neighborhoods like Watercolor, Rivercamps, Watersound etc. is subject to building codes, approved materials, architectural design and size guidelines, and house by house approval on everything down to the paint colors and exterior light fixtures, so the argument that they should extend build-outs to control "quality" is hooey.
That would be the build-out EXTENSIONS responsible for that!
Realistically you would lose much more $ by going through the process and building an inferior house than by selling the lot or having St. Joe/the bank take it back.