Disagreeing on opinions is perfectly acceptable.
Disagreeing in the face of facts, or reason is not.
Look back over the past 20 or so posts, your argument that ?the term Islamofascism nails the ideology [of Al-Qaeda]? is not defendable. Fascism requires a state. Period. There is no state in Al Qaeda. Period. Debate over.
You aren?t arguing with a fencepost, you are arguing with someone who is determined to move the political discussions in a rational direction.. No matter how persistent your responses are, no matter how determined you are to get the last word ?if the last word isn?t a rational one then it isn?t relevant.
Concede the point and move on to the next one.
I'm not conceding anything. "Islamo"-modifies "fascism". Islamo-fascism is the ideology that strives to subordinate the individual and society to that of Islam, and a future Islamic state, as prescribed by the Qur'an.
