Back to All About SoWal

Cuchens' ethics to be questioned if found

Sally avatar
Beach Fanatic
7,448 views
By Gabriel Tynes

Walton County Administrator Ronnie Bell told the Florida Department of Environmental Protection two letters written by District Four County Commissioner Rosier Cuchens regarding a single, after-thefact seawall permit last summer were ?not official.?

Sarah Williams, a DEP spokesperson, said Cuchens wrote the letters in June, shortly after the wall was discovered by a DEP aerial survey in May. Williams also said there were ?no records? of an application ever filed and the DEP then contacted the county to affirm the findings.

On May 16, the DEP sent the property owners a warning letter stating that there was no documentation of the seawall construction at 59 Pelican Circle, and the wall could be ?contributing to violations? of construction on the Coastal Control Line.

On June 6, Cuchens wrote a letter to the DEP stating the wall was not in violation of any codes or zoning requirements. He also stated the wall was built on an emergency basis, to prevent the ?impending undermining of the house foundation.?

In his second letter received Aug. 4, Cuchens wrote the wall was in compliance with the county?s comprehensive plan. Cuchens? letters were also accompanied by an after-the-fact seawall permit application and engineering evaluation from Anderson Engineers.

According to Bell, determining which projects are within the guidelines of the comprehensive plan is exclusively the responsibility of engineers from the Walton County Planning and Development Services Division.

Upon learning of Cuchens? letters on Oct. 16, Bell wrote the DEP to advise that Cuchens? letters were not ?offi cial.? Bell did not refer to Cuchens specifically in his notifi cation, and rather referenced the letters as ?county? letters.

In a phone call last week, Assistant County Administrator Shirl Williams said she did ?not know what Cuchens was trying to do? with the letters.

?We didn?t hear anything about the wall until after the permit was complete,? Williams said.

She said letters of authorization could only be signed by planning department Environmental Manager Billy McKee, and Cuchens ?had no right? to speak for the county in the matter. Furthermore, she said the county has not issued permits outside of emergency guidelines, which expired in October 2005.

According to county public records, the property belongs to Dr. James R. Spires, whose primary residence is in Mobile, Ala. Spires has not fi led any construction papers in almost 10 years, and the only documents pertaining to infrastructure on his two adjacent lots were commencement of construction notifications for the main house, a guest house and a swimming pool.

Today, the property is listed for sale by the owners at a price of $15 million. An online advertisement at forsalebyowner. com lists features such as an alarm system, gated entryway and stucco wall enclosure but does not include any information on a coastal armoring device. The exact measurements of the wall are not known but plat information gives the Spires? a combined 220 feet of gulf-front property.

A second warning letter from The DEP issued June 26 cautioned the Spires? that ?sand fill appears to have been done outside the subject property boundaries.? Today, between 12-18 inches of wall still protrude from the top of the sand fill, and the project is not complete.

In repeated phone calls last week, Spires and his wife, Michelle, refused to answer questions about the wall and did not respond to messages at his office or on her cell phone.

DEP spokesperson Williams said, ?We didn?t see any documentation of the wall until after it was discovered,?

Later, with what they believed was county approval, the DEP deemed the Spires? application completed. Now, the application has been frozen awaiting a proper review by the planning department.

This is not the first time Cuchens has come under fire for seawall construction. The commissioner was investigated by the Florida Commission on Ethics after Hurricane Dennis for approving emergency armoring permits which subsequently brought revenue to his family?s own construction business. That operation, Choctawhatchee Bay Piling and Dock, Inc., built dozens of seawalls after the emergency permits were issued last year.

On Oct. 10, the FCE found that Cuchens had no ?voting conflict when he voted on measures affecting his private business.?

No records indicate which company constructed the Spires? wall last spring.

After a flurry of coastal construction projects last fall, many walls are now barely noticeable ? hidden beneath steep slopes of sand covered with growing vegetation. Yet controversy over the emergency seawall permitting process has been swirling in both private and public arenas since the day they were originally conceived. There have been previous problems with private encroachment on public land, miscommunication about regulations and guidelines, and allegations of inequality and subjectivity.

At the BCC meeting on Oct. 10, attorney Dana Matthews openly insinuated that the county has routinely mishandled the permitting process, and the comprehensive plan actually suggests the walls could be built with the stipulation that they protect the dune systems. He also testified that the county issued other permits without the knowledge of county planning engineers.

Matthews, who was representing four property owners unrelated to the Spires? case, was seeking approval to continue all seawall construction without emergency permits, which have not been issued since October 2005. He believes the county should be removed from the process all together.

?This ?cooperation? between the county and the state has been a nightmare,? Matthews said. ?A quandary.?

?The county abrogated jurisdiction of the beach to the DEP in 1996,? Matthews explained. ?And now their involvement is obstructing the very progress they are trying to achieve.

?If [the county] wants to delegate, they need to step back and decide how to do it because we can?t have a half-armored, unregulated beach.?

Meanwhile, Sarah Williams said the DEP has received ?several? afterthe-fact applications from Walton County, although their requirements continue to mandate county approval.

?[This case] is not isolated,? Williams said. ?But the DEP will not issue permanent permits without official county approval.?

Replies

45
BlueMtnBeachVagrant avatar
Beach Fanatic
#27
I think we should armour the entire beach with rip rap.
That would work.
Smiling JOe avatar
SoWal Expert
#28
That would work.
I know it would work. It would make all of the tourists leave and never come back. Life in SoWal would be nice and quiet. Who cares about the beach? Just give me peace and quiet.
BlueMtnBeachVagrant avatar
Beach Fanatic
#29
I know it would work. It would make all of the tourists leave and never come back. Life in SoWal would be nice and quiet. Who cares about the beach? Just give me peace and quiet.
Good idea.
Bob avatar
SoWal Insider
#30
In the next big storm, lash the "armored" homeowners to their seawalls. Maybe they will wash ashore in Daytona Beach and be right at home.
kathydwells avatar
Darlene is my middle name, not my nickname
#31
I know it would work. It would make all of the tourists leave and never come back. Life in SoWal would be nice and quiet. Who cares about the beach? Just give me peace and quiet.

:roll:
Beach Comber
#32
update

and also have had a good bit of experience dealing with the Planning Dept. My thoughts:
1. To reiterate from the article, not only was there no DEP permit issued prior to constructing this 200' seawall(which probably cost $150k), neither was there ANY county permit of any type.
2. Does anyone actually believe that this "temporary wall" will have to be torn down? Of course not, and the lesson for the rest of us continues to be, those with $$ and power will do what they want and if caught ask for forgiveness later.
3. This type wall with a 90 degree angle on the end will absolutely undermine the neighbors dirt when the next storm surge comes along running down the beach.
4. Even if one has DEP approval for a seawall, is it permissible to build seaward of the CCL? Seaward of your own property line? This owner does not have a metes and bounds legal description, but rather is in a subdivision and I believe the wall probably is seaward of his property line.

The Walton Planning office will have to be the subject of another post, but suffice it to say IF you can get an answer from them, It'll probably be wrong. They do not return calls, do not answer emails, and generally do not want to see you in person-basically the opposite of what a public agency should be. The lesson I am learning is to just go ahead and do what you want; do not under any circumstances ask for permission.

The DEP has denied the "after the fact" application for a seawall in this case.
rapunzel avatar
Beach Fanatic
#33
What will happen to the wall now?
Smiling JOe avatar
SoWal Expert
#34
Interesting to see Cuchens and ethics used in the same title.
John R avatar
needs to get out more
#35
Interesting to see Cuchens and ethics used in the same title.

i saw the thread title and asked myself "how can there be a question regarding ro's ethics?"
Franny avatar
Beach Fanatic
#36
There is an article in the Sun paper today regarding the seawall. Interesting!
Beach Comber
#37
Key part of this article:

(because it contains DEP's "out" to allow this wall to remain) I paraphrase, but "vegetation was found growing on the sand covering the wall".

As the writer tried to note, this is a TOTAL fabrication. There is not, nor has there ever been, any vegetation on that wall. Of course, I'm sure the landowner is out there as we speak planting some. Best money he will ever spend.
Smiling JOe avatar
SoWal Expert
#38
I bet the property owner is also ordering truckloads of sand to cover that long seawall's presently uncovered top 4' +.

Here is the article from the Walton Sun:
DEP orders homeowners to remove unauthorized seawall
By Gabriel Tynes
April 28, 2007 5:31 AM

The seawall at 59 Pelican Circle in Seacrest Beach appears the same today (above)



At least one South Walton County seawall will have to be pulled from the sand after the Department of Environmental Protection denied its state permit request.

The wall, located at 59 Pelican Circle in Seacrest Beach, has been under particular scrutiny since it was determined to be unauthorized in May 2006. The homeowners, Dr. James and Michelle Spires of Mobile, Ala., never obtained county permission for the wall.

Subsequently, Terry Anderson, a Walton County engineer, attempted to acquire an after-the-fact state permit on behalf of the homeowners. As a part of that process, former county commissioner Rosier Cuchens issued a letter of approval in the county?s name, bypassing normal planning department procedures, something he was not authorized to do.

In a letter dated April 17, Michael Barnett, chief of the DEP Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems, concluded that the structures on the property were never eligible for shoreline protection. Even if it was, the letter said, Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission guidelines would recommend its denial based on ?significant adverse impacts? to turtle nesting sites.

?Based on the forgoing facts and law, the DEP denies the request for a permit for the construction of a seawall and orders its removal after Oct. 31, 2007, and before May 1, 2008,? the letter states.
In a confusing bit of language, the letter does provide a manner for prolonging the seawall?s existence ?since [it] is presently covered with sand fill and native dune vegetation.?

On April 24, the wall did not appear to have changed since November 2006. There is as much as four feet of vertical exposure and it is barren of any vegetation, native or otherwise.

?We came to that conclusion upon our last inspection of the site,? said DEP Press Secretary Sarah Williams. ?Our inspector noted sand coverage and native vegetation.?

Williams said she did not know if the absence of either the sand fill or the vegetation would affect the special stipulation, which would allow the wall to stay until it is exposed or undermined. ?Everything we have on the case is current with that letter,? she said. The homeowners were given 15 days from the receipt of the letter to ask for the seawall to remain temporarily. They have 21 days from the receipt of the letter to file for an administrative hearing to dispute the denial.
John R avatar
needs to get out more
#39
Ro's Ethics?? And, he's running again?

Was this seawall ever removed?

At least one South Walton County seawall will have to be pulled from the sand after the Department of Environmental Protection denied its state permit request.

The wall, located at 59 Pelican Circle in Seacrest Beach, has been under particular scrutiny since it was determined to be unauthorized in May 2006. The homeowners, Dr. James and Michelle Spires of Mobile, Ala., never obtained county permission for the wall.
wrobert avatar
Beach Fanatic
#40
Was this seawall ever removed?

At least one South Walton County seawall will have to be pulled from the sand after the Department of Environmental Protection denied its state permit request.

The wall, located at 59 Pelican Circle in Seacrest Beach, has been under particular scrutiny since it was determined to be unauthorized in May 2006. The homeowners, Dr. James and Michelle Spires of Mobile, Ala., never obtained county permission for the wall.


How would someone find this out? Just go see?
Abby Prentiss avatar
Beach Fanatic
#41
Say no to good ole boy politics. Say no to ignorance. Say no to Ro.
coppertone10 avatar
Beach Comber
#42
My Motto...

As a 30-year resident of Walton County, I can remember each of Ro Cuchens' previous terms. The thing that helped me most was the fact that I was always able to tell when Rosier was lying - his lips were moving.
As an earlier post noted, I am surprised to see the words "Ro" and "ethics" in the same sentence, so you can guess what my motto is --
NoMoRo !!!
Abby Prentiss avatar
Beach Fanatic
#43
The problem is he will get tons of votes from "friends" north of the bay and people in the south end - well, to be kind, they are out of town or out to lunch much of the time and could care less who is in charge.
Lake View Too avatar
SoWal Insider
#44
The problem is he will get tons of votes from "friends" north of the bay and people in the south end - well, to be kind, they are out of town or out to lunch much of the time and could care less who is in charge.

Well said.
rapunzel avatar
Beach Fanatic
#45
I'm predicting that won't be so much the case this time around. Particularly in precinct 29. Vote by Mail registration is up, and I think people may have learned a lesson with the whole Cecelia Jones debacle. We shall see...
coppertone10 avatar
Beach Comber
#46
You are so right. How ethical is it for an acting commissioner to actually make calls to people she doesn't know, asking them not to vote for Comander because she "doesn't vote the right way." I guess Ms. Jones thinks the right way is to vote for higher taxes and to keep her husband's health insurance on the backs of taxpayers as long as possible. Looks like her ethics are missing, too, assuming she ever had any. :idontno:






I'm predicting that won't be so much the case this time around. Particularly in precinct 29. Vote by Mail registration is up, and I think people may have learned a lesson with the whole Cecelia Jones debacle. We shall see...

Checking your forum account

Please wait while we verify your forum account.