• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
New posts

scooterbug44

SoWal Expert
May 8, 2007
16,706
3,339
Sowal
I don't think they are so safe - I don't trust the Chinese government (though if they decide to not honor their responsibilities, return on investment will be a minor concern as they own 2/3 of us) and I think they are starting to find out all of the negative aspects of their unchecked industrial expansion. They are poisoning their country to keep Walmart stocked and IMO they are also about to have some massive social upheaval.

Though I want popcorn to watch how they deal with Kim Jong Psycho's latest attempt to start a war - you know that nutty lil' pucker will try to screw everything up in that geographic area regardless of the consequences.
 

beachFool

Beach Fanatic
May 6, 2007
938
442
I ran the report again using 1Mo T-Bills which may more closely mimic individual portfolios.

The result was lower (4.97 annualized return, rebalanced annually Jan 2000-Dec 2009) still a long way from a lost decade.

This ain't advice rather cold hard numbers.

Lucifer you are so right.
 

Lynnie

SoWal Insider
Apr 18, 2007
8,151
434
SoBuc
Interesting, Buz. Thank you. It seems there might be a few lost months between 2008 and 2009 if someone was heavily trading trying to make up for paper losses, but I tend to concur, it was not a lost decade.

Lucifer, you should stay in cash for a while.
 

scooterbug44

SoWal Expert
May 8, 2007
16,706
3,339
Sowal
If it was a "lost decade" I should run a hedge fund, because I still improved my portfolio. ;-)

Just because a stock is down doesn't mean it stops paying dividends.
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter