So I took a walk the other day to see what all the umbrella talk was about at BMB Regional Access, The first thing I noticed was all the beach service chairs and umbrellas that monopolized the eastern third to half of the public beach. Normally not an issue except most of these setups were not even used and the rest of the beach was getting a little crowded. That doesn't necessary imply the empty seats were not paid for but I don't know for sure. Again, the occupancy rate was relative low. This is public beach space that the typical visitor who walks up with their own setup cannot use.
Some would argue this makes some of the tourists happy which brings in more money and so on. So the average family on a limited budget has to compete for space against the beach service for room on a public beach.
My personal feeling is that one should not be able to "buy a front row seat" at a public beach, period.
Some, of course, would argue this point but they probably have a financial interest in the beach service business on public beaches.
However (and currently), via a single vendor, there are more than enough beach setups directly adjacent to the public access in front of the "4 white homes" FOR USE BY THE PUBLIC located on their private property. Apparently the owners have allowed a beach vendor to vend on their private property to the PUBLIC. This is great news if you are a visitor and want beach service. Just walk up, pay the fee, sit down and enjoy the beach. You're getting private beach and chair service for the price of just chair service alone...that's a good deal in my book. Disclosure: I have absolutely no financial interest in this situation...I don't even know the vendors involved.
If beach vending is eliminated at the BMB Regional Access, this would obviously relieve a lot of the pressure from the public part of the access by freeing up the entire beach to those visitors who provide "self service" umbrellas and chairs.
I only see one loser in this scenario...the vendor(s) for the public beach but read further on how the displaced vendor(s) could benefit.
What a novel idea....private property owners allowing the public to use private beach via beach service!!
The county can't solve all the issues in one fell swoop, but this is definitely a situation where a little common sense at this location would benefit all involved.
Who knows, maybe other private property owners will join in and replicate this arrangement at other accesses especially if the county gets behind it. Maybe the displaced vendor(s) replicates this model at another crowded access. Everybody wins! Of course, parking is still another issue - no nourishment or customary use will ever fix that, only planning (and money) by the BCC.
I tip my hat to the owners of the "4 white homes" and truly hope others are able to follow their lead, Who knows, maybe the Retreat can even see a financial benefit - "make money not war".![Smile :) :)]()
Hopefully the BCC, TDC and other private property owners are ahead on me on this topic.
Some would argue this makes some of the tourists happy which brings in more money and so on. So the average family on a limited budget has to compete for space against the beach service for room on a public beach.
My personal feeling is that one should not be able to "buy a front row seat" at a public beach, period.
Some, of course, would argue this point but they probably have a financial interest in the beach service business on public beaches.
However (and currently), via a single vendor, there are more than enough beach setups directly adjacent to the public access in front of the "4 white homes" FOR USE BY THE PUBLIC located on their private property. Apparently the owners have allowed a beach vendor to vend on their private property to the PUBLIC. This is great news if you are a visitor and want beach service. Just walk up, pay the fee, sit down and enjoy the beach. You're getting private beach and chair service for the price of just chair service alone...that's a good deal in my book. Disclosure: I have absolutely no financial interest in this situation...I don't even know the vendors involved.
If beach vending is eliminated at the BMB Regional Access, this would obviously relieve a lot of the pressure from the public part of the access by freeing up the entire beach to those visitors who provide "self service" umbrellas and chairs.
I only see one loser in this scenario...the vendor(s) for the public beach but read further on how the displaced vendor(s) could benefit.
What a novel idea....private property owners allowing the public to use private beach via beach service!!
The county can't solve all the issues in one fell swoop, but this is definitely a situation where a little common sense at this location would benefit all involved.
Who knows, maybe other private property owners will join in and replicate this arrangement at other accesses especially if the county gets behind it. Maybe the displaced vendor(s) replicates this model at another crowded access. Everybody wins! Of course, parking is still another issue - no nourishment or customary use will ever fix that, only planning (and money) by the BCC.
I tip my hat to the owners of the "4 white homes" and truly hope others are able to follow their lead, Who knows, maybe the Retreat can even see a financial benefit - "make money not war".
Hopefully the BCC, TDC and other private property owners are ahead on me on this topic.