• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
New posts

Andy A

Beach Fanatic
Feb 28, 2007
4,389
1,738
Blue Mountain Beach
No, this was to make sure the ban can not be lifted. What is wrong with letting the people decide?
I totally disagree. It was, politics pure and simple. I, as you know, live as close as one can to the gulf. I am totally in favor of a ban on drilling in state waters. That does not mean you need a Constitutional amendment to prevent it. We already have one concerning pigs and how great is that? Once you make something, anything, part of the Constitution it is very hard to change it. Be careful what you wish for. Also, it is my firm belief that the rest of Florida would not vote for the ban anyway.
 
Last edited:

Gidget

Beach Fanatic
May 27, 2009
2,452
638
Blue Mtn Beach!!
I posted a short video and a collage of photos taken yesterday at the event. I put them under Photos and Videos :D in case anyone is interested.
 

Andy A

Beach Fanatic
Feb 28, 2007
4,389
1,738
Blue Mountain Beach
That's the point, isn't it?

Well, we'll never know now.
What are you talking about? It can be put up at the next special session or a regular session of the legislature. As stated previously, by me and others, this was a ploy by Crist to seek political favor and nothing more. Even if its true the ban can be lifted by a simple majority in both branches of the legislature, it will be in effect until they are in session!
 

Gidget

Beach Fanatic
May 27, 2009
2,452
638
Blue Mtn Beach!!
Note:

Republicans supported a constitutional ban on gay marriage in 2008, despite laws on the books that already prevent it.

***********************

Total hypocrisy!! Hhmmmm I wonder if that is the "moral values" being discussed over on the other thread. :sarc:
 

Arkiehawg

Beach Fanatic
Jul 14, 2007
1,880
394
SoWal
You Republicans who continue to support these idiots that changed their "opinion" to be against drilling off Florida's coast AFTER the spill and NOW aren't interested in representing the VAST majority of Florida's citizens interest in a vote on a constitutional Ban on drilling deserve to experience everything that the oil whores of Louisiana are experiencing now. You are very naive to believe that YOUR republican leadership will not work hard on lifting the ban next year.
 
Last edited:

GoodWitch58

Beach Fanatic
Oct 10, 2005
4,810
1,923
No NW Fl. Members Lead Policy Groups...

Tallahassee Democrat - www.floridacapitalnews.com - Tallahassee, FL.
But while tar balls are staining Northwest Florida beaches, none of the six legislative working groups Cretul assigned to the task is led by a Panhandle legislator.

Three of the lead lawmakers on the groups are from Southwest Florida, as is the chief coordinator they will answer to, Rep. Gary Aubuchon, a Republican from oil-free Cape Coral.

Three of the leads, including Aubuchon, serve on a committee that spent months laying the groundwork to lift Florida's 20-year offshore drilling ban.


...and with this we can all feel very secure that we'll never have near-shore drilling off our coast.
 
Last edited:

Koa

Beach Fanatic
Jul 17, 2010
260
56
If Marti Coley had thought things through, she would have said earlier that she supports the ban, but wanted to propose a special session in August, not wait till September, so as to allot more time for the appropriate legal language to be added to the Constitution that is rock solid. Frankly, with most of the legislature being lawyers, you would think that 4 days would be sufficient with enough heads working on it, but obviously with Marti not having any legal experience, how would she know? :sarc:; but, instead, no, they are going to wait till September and have a bunch of newbies working on special relief committees. What a joke. :roll::roll:

Florida is in a crisis now and the special legislature at least has a job. The least they could do is work through the summer and take a lousy week if need be, but they should all be in Tallahassee the rest of the summer working on Florida's coastal communities needs and let BP foot the bill. I'm betting they are hoping that the people may be less furious and protective come September as the season dies down and some claims are paid.

How could anyone not believe the vote to adjourn wasn't politically motivated?
It's not like any of those dingbats actually read the bills they vote on, much less write them. The only thing they want to be sure to get right is the pork that is headed their way.
 

Koa

Beach Fanatic
Jul 17, 2010
260
56
What are you talking about? It can be put up at the next special session or a regular session of the legislature. As stated previously, by me and others, this was a ploy by Crist to seek political favor and nothing more. Even if its true the ban can be lifted by a simple majority in both branches of the legislature, it will be in effect until they are in session!

Remember that just before they adjourned at the end of last year, the House voted to lift the ban on drilling. All things, including Obama, were leading toward Florida having drilling. Then, the BP explosion and catastrophe happened/is happening.
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter