• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
New posts

BeachSiO2

Beach Fanatic
Jun 16, 2006
3,294
737
How long will it be until someone calls "it" the "War of Northern Aggression?":dunno:
 

30A Skunkape

Skunky
Jan 18, 2006
10,279
2,320
54
Backatown Seagrove
I can't find an image of Louisiana's Sons of Confederate Veteran's plate, but the state's DMV says that the funds from each plate are devoted to the purchase of Louisiana history texts for schools. One thing that thankfully was absent from ole Lou was an absence of Confederate flag mania...the state flag features a Pelican and was never altered in the name of the lost cause.
 

TooFarTampa

SoWal Insider
Re-election has never played a role in Don's representation of his district. But he does get re-elected at some of the highest rates in the State of Florida, and has been rated an A+ legislator by several non-partisan organizations.

I also believe that we have way too many vanity plates in this State, but in a country with a 1st amendment, is it fair that we allow some to have plates for their causes yet others are not allowed because as a majority we do not care for their cause? If the plate is allowed, one can just choose not to purchase it if they do not support the message.

The bill was submitted at the request of a group of constituents. Do we want someone in office that represents everyone, or just represents people that they agree with?

The plate does look kind of neat, imho.

In this case I would say absolutely, because like it or not, the Confederate flag has become a divisive and inflammatory symbol to the vast majority of Americans.

When so many prominent and not so prominent hate groups have adapted what once was regarded as a symbol of pride, well, to quote The Princess Bride: "I do not think it means what you think it means."

The swastika for thousands of years was used to represent life, sun, power, strength, and good luck. But in our post-Nazi Germany world it is IMO the most repellant symbol known to man.

I would not rate the Confederate flag as being quite so repellant -- but there are some that would. The Confederacy was not the same as Nazi Germany, but there are people who have used the Confederate flag as a symbol of their own evil, and while those people did not have the power that Hitler did, some of them had just as much evil in them. The KKK comes to mind.

Displaying the Confederate flag may not make you a racist, but it undoubtedly symbolizes racism to many. And it HAS been used as a prop or cover by some. Consider this story, from Infoplease.com:

In 1956, Georgia adopted a new state flag that, like Mississippi's, incorporated the Confederate battle flag in its design. The flag, introduced two years after Brown v. Board of Education (1954), represented the Georgia legislature's protest against forced integration. Although some claim the new flag was adopted in anticipation of the Confederate Centennial in the 1960s, this argument was largely dismissed as disingenuous. In fact, the very sponsor of 1956 flag, former Georgia House floor speaker Denmark Groover, openly admitted forty-five years later that defiance of segregation was the motivating force behind the new flag, not historical sentiment.

And in Feb. 2001, in Tallahassee:

"Renovations required the removal of the four flags flying above the capitol. The flags, each representing a part of Florida's history, included Spanish, French, and British flags as well as the Confederate "stainless banner," the second national flag of the Confederacy. At the request of Governor Jeb Bush, none of the flags was again raised above the capitol. A spokesperson for Governor Bush commented that, "the governor believes that most Floridians would agree that the symbols of Florida's past should not be displayed in a manner that may divide Floridians today."
 
Last edited:

elgordoboy

Beach Fanatic
Feb 9, 2007
2,507
888
I no longer stay in Dune Allen
In this case I would say absolutely, because like it or not, the Confederate flag has become a divisive and inflammatory symbol to the vast majority of Americans.

When so many prominent and not so prominent hate groups have adapted what once was regarded as a symbol of pride, well, to quote The Princess Bride: "I do not think it means what you think it means."

The swastika for thousands of years was used to represent life, sun, power, strength, and good luck. But in our post-Nazi Germany world it is IMO the most repellant symbol known to man.

I would not rate the Confederate flag as being quite so repellant -- but there are some that would. The Confederacy was not the same as Nazi Germany, but there are people who have used the Confederate flag as a symbol of their own evil, and while those people did not have the power that Hitler did, some of them had just as much evil in them. The KKK comes to mind.

Displaying the Confederate flag may not make you a racist, but it undoubtedly symbolizes racism to many. And it HAS been used as a prop or cover by some. Consider this story, from Infoplease.com:

In 1956, Georgia adopted a new state flag that, like Mississippi's, incorporated the Confederate battle flag in its design. The flag, introduced two years after Brown v. Board of Education (1954), represented the Georgia legislature's protest against forced integration. Although some claim the new flag was adopted in anticipation of the Confederate Centennial in the 1960s, this argument was largely dismissed as disingenuous. In fact, the very sponsor of 1956 flag, former Georgia House floor speaker Denmark Groover, openly admitted forty-five years later that defiance of segregation was the motivating force behind the new flag, not historical sentiment.

And in Feb. 2001, in Tallahassee:

"Renovations required the removal of the four flags flying above the capitol. The flags, each representing a part of Florida's history, included Spanish, French, and British flags as well as the Confederate "stainless banner," the second national flag of the Confederacy. At the request of Governor Jeb Bush, none of the flags was again raised above the capitol. A spokesperson for Governor Bush commented that, "the governor believes that most Floridians would agree that the symbols of Florida's past should not be displayed in a manner that may divide Floridians today."
Excellent post.
 

InletBchDweller

SoWal Insider
Feb 14, 2006
6,802
263
55
Prairieville, La
ok, what about these tags??? I am not saying that they offend me but somebody could put a twist on it showing how each of the tags below would offend someone - just like the Confederate flag does some.

choose_life.jpg





florida_sheriff_youth_ranch.jpg



NASCAR.jpg




live_the_dream.jpg
 

TooFarTampa

SoWal Insider
1) This has been the most controversial one by far but the most offensive thing about IMO it is it could be construed as "anti-privacy". I don't think it evokes an emotional reaction like the Confederate flag tends to do.

2) I don't know how this one could be offensive. I am offended by the pretend cops organizations that call and ask me for money all the time. :bang:

3) :rotfl:

4) MLK: He did play around on his wife, but otherwise? An inspirational, not offensive, figure.
 

Jdarg

SoWal Expert
Feb 15, 2005
18,038
1,980
#1 is problematic because a "balance" plate was never offered- some sort of reproductive freedom theme.

IMO- there should not be a license plate for either side of the choice issue- personal matters do not belong on license plates.
 

TooFarTampa

SoWal Insider
#1 is problematic because a "balance" plate was never offered- some sort of reproductive freedom theme.

IMO- there should not be a license plate for either side of the choice issue- personal matters do not belong on license plates.

Some people are calling for the end of vanity plates altogether. It will never happen -- they raise lots of money for major universities, and a bit of money for the minor ones. Also the Florida panther and the manatees.
 

chrisv

Beach Fanatic
Nov 15, 2004
630
75
Freeport, Florida
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter