• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
New posts

GoodWitch58

Beach Fanatic
Oct 10, 2005
4,810
1,923
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/22/us/politics/22chamber.html?_r=1&hp
Prudential Financial sent in a $2 million donation last year as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce kicked off a national advertising campaign to weaken the historic rewrite of the nation?s financial regulations.

Dow Chemical delivered $1.7 million to the chamber last year as the group took a leading role in aggressively fighting proposed rules that would impose tighter security requirements on chemical facilities.

And Goldman Sachs, Chevron Texaco, and Aegon, a multinational insurance company based in the Netherlands, donated more than $8 million in recent years to a chamber foundation that has been critical of growing federal regulation and spending. These large donations ? none of which were publicly disclosed by the chamber, a tax-exempt

...so, is a corporate owned government okay...but, a government owned by the people is not?
 
Last edited:

30ashopper

SoWal Insider
Apr 30, 2008
6,845
3,471
59
Right here!
Every group has some form of lobbying arm in Washington. The Chamber's primary purpose is to lobby government for pro-business legislation. There are plenty of lobbying groups for other industries, the AFCIO, NEA, Acorn, ABA, the list goes on and on. Heck, some of the previous leaders of these groups currently hold seats in the cabinet. I'm not sure why democrats are making such a big deal of this, they are opening up a can of worms if they do.
 

Matt J

SWGB
May 9, 2007
24,862
9,670
I wonder if the supreme court will lift the maximum contribution limits for individuals like they did for corporations? We're equal right?
 

futurebeachbum

Beach Fanatic
Jul 11, 2005
1,100
375
70
Snellsburg, GA
www.myfloridacottage.com
I wonder if the supreme court will lift the maximum contribution limits for individuals like they did for corporations? We're equal right?

They should. People should have the right to donate as much as they care to the candidate or cause of their choice.

It needs to be open though. Campaign funding laws should require that every donation be tied to verified, legally able to donate tax-payer ID, reported to the IRS and made pubic information.
 

GoodWitch58

Beach Fanatic
Oct 10, 2005
4,810
1,923
So, how much is a Speaker-ship worth....

Marco Rubio's personal finances clash with call for fiscal discipline - St. Petersburg Times
For a candidate promising to put America's fiscal house in order, Marco Rubio has a tough time keeping his own house tidy, plagued by questionable spending and sloppy accounting.

On the campaign trail, Rubio likes to say "politicians don't create jobs." But politics, directly and indirectly, has generated Rubio's sizeable income, even as he has accumulated substantial debt and saw one of his homes nearly go into foreclosure.
 
Last edited:

Matt J

SWGB
May 9, 2007
24,862
9,670
They should. People should have the right to donate as much as they care to the candidate or cause of their choice.

It needs to be open though. Campaign funding laws should require that every donation be tied to verified, legally able to donate tax-payer ID, reported to the IRS and made pubic information.

Shh, the local Tea Baggers would have a fit. :D
 

Bob

SoWal Insider
Nov 16, 2004
10,366
1,391
O'Wal
They should. People should have the right to donate as much as they care to the candidate or cause of their choice.

It needs to be open though. Campaign funding laws should require that every donation be tied to verified, legally able to donate tax-payer ID, reported to the IRS and made pubic information.
terrible idea....leads to undue influence
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter