So what does everybody think? I'm going to surprise a few and side on the camp that feels Obama's way of handling this was the right choice. Personally, I could care less about Iran or their revolution, I think it's something that's going to happen (at some point) regardless of what we do or say, so staying out of it seems fine with me. I can understand why the right frets over Obama's response over the weekend as being weak, (because I can see how extemists would see it as weak) but personally I see it more as well calculated. We are a "political football" that Ahmadinejad can exploit, so why give him the ball. The younger Iranian generations don't need any help from us, they can handle things just fine on their own.
Now I'm not a fan of Obama, and I honestly believe he harbors more sympathy for Arabs than Jews, but we have enough problems to deal with, and Iran is a pot being stirred internally by it's own revolutionary forces, so I'd prefer we just stay out of it. If we are concerned about exported terrorism, we should be working on a stronger defense (e.g. border and port security) rather than stirring up a hornets nest in Iran by taking a side. Anybody esle care to comment?
Now I'm not a fan of Obama, and I honestly believe he harbors more sympathy for Arabs than Jews, but we have enough problems to deal with, and Iran is a pot being stirred internally by it's own revolutionary forces, so I'd prefer we just stay out of it. If we are concerned about exported terrorism, we should be working on a stronger defense (e.g. border and port security) rather than stirring up a hornets nest in Iran by taking a side. Anybody esle care to comment?