I've been to several meetings on this issue, and that is the way the ordinance reads: if your house was destroyed, you would only be able to build back to the 25% footprint, even if your house had been larger than 25% since 1951 or whatever.
And we aren't just talking about the house footprint. We are talking about walkways,driveways, etc.
These are some of the provisions that need tweaking. I don't think anyone is talking about wholesale scrapping of the ordinance. Just giving some long time residents some assurance that their property isn't being de-valued.
Can anyone give us some insight on what exactly happened at the meeting?
And we aren't just talking about the house footprint. We are talking about walkways,driveways, etc.
These are some of the provisions that need tweaking. I don't think anyone is talking about wholesale scrapping of the ordinance. Just giving some long time residents some assurance that their property isn't being de-valued.
Can anyone give us some insight on what exactly happened at the meeting?