Thank you swordfish. It is difficult when it is your family being slandered and smeared across the papers and sowal. There is a HUGE issue here that has not really been addressed- there are NO witnesses to this incident at all. Not one person to verify that the story printed in the paper ( my husband becoming disorderly and hitting the bartender), the story that Ms Jodi was so kind as to embellish with her own ridiculous accounts of adulterous behavior. Therefore, this incident really has not happened at all. Who will come out more credible? Two college educated, professional parents quietly raising their family in this community or "shady" staff at the bar? Has anybody else not noted that I am making a blanket request for witnesses to go directly to FDLE? I do not need to talk to them because I already know what happened. This places the ones telling the truth in a position of power and lends the other side defenseless to continue fabricating a story without knowing what information has been delivered. The newspaper also did not account the threat and intimidation both my husband and I have undergone to not pursue this. When this investigation is completed and the truth is printed, with our good names cleared, I hope that you who have stood so viciously in judgement will consider for a moment the enormity of all of this...
Incident at Cafe Rendevous last Friday
- Thread starter WaltonConcern
- Start date
-
Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
Excuse me Ms Calamity..but NOT ONCE did I (nor anyone else on the forum) ever mention anything regarding "adulterous behavior" and that just seems to me that maybe you dont really trust the man as much as you like to profess. I have done nothing but give my own opinions on this this matter so if I embellished anything it was not the actions of your spouse OR the actions of the staff at Cafe Rendezvous.
I can tell you one thing from working in several establishments that serve alcohol (or ANY place of business for that matter), when a patron becomes disorderly you can bet that the authorities will be on the side of that business owner and NOT on the side of the unruly patron. Maybe the ones making these so-called "threats" are just trying to save you and your family more embarrassment/ money by letting you know that with no witnesses and a victim whos memory is cloudy at best, there isnt much of a chance of you being on the winning side of this debacle.
OH really? Now you are saying that you were there? Or are you just going on info (third party and therefore not admissible in court) given to you by a spouse caught in a bad position at an establishment that you are labeling "shady" due to one incident?
And another little tidbit of MY OPINION......if I was the owner of this establishment I wouldnt waste another moment of my time on some "sue-happy" person trying to create a situation that there is obviously no grounds for just to garner attention and possibly profit from when there is obviously no evidence of misconduct on their part.
And just because you have taken it to the ASA doesnt mean that they are going to find anything to back up your claims or that you will be successful in your bid to slander/libel this place of business into closing. In my opinion...your best bet would be to drop it and tell the hubby to stop visiting shady bars til the wee hours of the morning.
CJ, I dont know you or your husband. I am making the following statements based only on what I have read here and in the paper.
~ Just b/c your husband goes our to a bar and you are not with him does not make him a "cheater". If someone accuses him of that then they themselves may have their own personal problems. Husband and wive can party seperately. ;-)
~ I do think that it is strange, very very strange, that not one single person is speaking up.
~My cell phone works in Seaside.
~ I dont think Rendevous is "shady" but I also dont think that 90% of Walton County residents go there either.
~$58? glass of wine? a ticket was either padded or someone had more than they thought...
~ Just b/c your husband goes our to a bar and you are not with him does not make him a "cheater". If someone accuses him of that then they themselves may have their own personal problems. Husband and wive can party seperately. ;-)
~ I do think that it is strange, very very strange, that not one single person is speaking up.
~My cell phone works in Seaside.
~ I dont think Rendevous is "shady" but I also dont think that 90% of Walton County residents go there either.
~$58? glass of wine? a ticket was either padded or someone had more than they thought...
Last edited:
Now I'm wondering why your husband would patronize a place you call "shady," and which you state everyone wants to see closed, to buy a $58 glass of wine. I think there is so much more to this story than any of us know. You accuse us of slander, and I fail to see that. Could you point out the slander to you and your husband? The truth is that only the people involved know what happened. First you mention that your husband doesn't remember anything other than getting knocked out, and waking up with injuries. Now, you say that you and he know exactly what happened. That leaves us wondering who knows what. I don't mean to drag this thing out, but there seem to be accusations without evidence. If you have your evidence, present your case.
I agree SJ, I am intrigued by this. I feel for her in a way, mad in another and then am confused in another.
Obviously there is much more to this story that we may never ever know. 
I hate getting interested in unsolved mysteries!!!
It is like that TV show, "Cold Case," where we never know who done what, but during the hour-long show, we start making our own little mini-movies about "who done it."
CJane, it does stink that your hubby was hit and sent to the hospital. I'd be a little more than upset if that happened to anyone I know. There are just too many unknowns for any of us to start making judgments and taking sides with either party involved. We are just rubberneckers who are too curious. Maybe you will report back to us after the commercial break.
CJane, it does stink that your hubby was hit and sent to the hospital. I'd be a little more than upset if that happened to anyone I know. There are just too many unknowns for any of us to start making judgments and taking sides with either party involved. We are just rubberneckers who are too curious. Maybe you will report back to us after the commercial break.
If the State does conduct an investigation, who will investigate? The investigator up in DFS (ASA's) is the wife of a WCSO Deputy, might that be a conflict of interest?
How about some of the truth?
As the facts in this have been so distorted, we have decided to disclose some of the truths we had hoped would come forward in the paper. We have the incident report and the full trurh between the two of us, so here goes:
- my husband never punched the bartender. This was not an act of self defense, but an aggravated battery upon my husband by 2 staff members. This incident occured in the parking lot 100s of feet from the door, and I would say far beyond what would be appropriate for bar employees to be involved in.
- my husband sustained a blow to the temporal region of his brain rendering him immediately unconscious. He sustained a closed head injury and subsequent concussion when he hit the ground
- his phone was taken from him while he tried to call EMS
-the incident report states the bartender did not want to press charges. My husband was not a suspect
- My husband was transported to the hospital without police escort. He was not a suspect
-Deputies arrived on their own at the hospital and threatened him for hours until he agreed to not press charges. He made multple requests that I be called and I was not
-Deputies arrived at my door at 3:30 am and delivered a fabricated story. I was intimidated and one threat was so low as to involve my baby
-We went to the station together Sat am to file a complaint of battery against the staff at the bar. We were denied the right to do so, and uncovered there was no incident report. There was a civilian witness to this who agreed to stand as a witness and I was prevented from getting his name and phone number from another deouty
-Deputies are required to write their incident reports prior to getting off duty, Grantham left shift without writing his. We showed up at the station to file our complaint prior to the incident report being initiated. The incident reports are electronically stamped and cannot be fabricated as to date of initiation.
- we have witnesses as to what happened at the hospital and the police station. Who is the victim here?
I do believe that this is not a joking matter of any kind. My husband could have been killed by this little game due to the head injury. I do not care about giving anybody "ammo" because it is in black and white and most of this cannot be fabricated. Along with justice, I do care that the truth be exposed. I will not stand for this, and am shocked that the rest of you do. I am in a job of service to the state too, and I guess that is why this disturbs me so much..but we in medicine have the Hippocratic Oath as our guiding factor. i would lose my license to practise physical therapy if I deliberately hurt a patient and fabricated evidence....why is law enforcment so different?
As the facts in this have been so distorted, we have decided to disclose some of the truths we had hoped would come forward in the paper. We have the incident report and the full trurh between the two of us, so here goes:
- my husband never punched the bartender. This was not an act of self defense, but an aggravated battery upon my husband by 2 staff members. This incident occured in the parking lot 100s of feet from the door, and I would say far beyond what would be appropriate for bar employees to be involved in.
- my husband sustained a blow to the temporal region of his brain rendering him immediately unconscious. He sustained a closed head injury and subsequent concussion when he hit the ground
- his phone was taken from him while he tried to call EMS
-the incident report states the bartender did not want to press charges. My husband was not a suspect
- My husband was transported to the hospital without police escort. He was not a suspect
-Deputies arrived on their own at the hospital and threatened him for hours until he agreed to not press charges. He made multple requests that I be called and I was not
-Deputies arrived at my door at 3:30 am and delivered a fabricated story. I was intimidated and one threat was so low as to involve my baby
-We went to the station together Sat am to file a complaint of battery against the staff at the bar. We were denied the right to do so, and uncovered there was no incident report. There was a civilian witness to this who agreed to stand as a witness and I was prevented from getting his name and phone number from another deouty
-Deputies are required to write their incident reports prior to getting off duty, Grantham left shift without writing his. We showed up at the station to file our complaint prior to the incident report being initiated. The incident reports are electronically stamped and cannot be fabricated as to date of initiation.
- we have witnesses as to what happened at the hospital and the police station. Who is the victim here?
I do believe that this is not a joking matter of any kind. My husband could have been killed by this little game due to the head injury. I do not care about giving anybody "ammo" because it is in black and white and most of this cannot be fabricated. Along with justice, I do care that the truth be exposed. I will not stand for this, and am shocked that the rest of you do. I am in a job of service to the state too, and I guess that is why this disturbs me so much..but we in medicine have the Hippocratic Oath as our guiding factor. i would lose my license to practise physical therapy if I deliberately hurt a patient and fabricated evidence....why is law enforcment so different?
I have been to this establishment on many occassions and never felt I was in a "shady" place. There's obviously a lot more to this story than is being reported/posted. However at the same time I find it interesting that not one person has come on here to complain that they should be closed.
I don't think that CJane is "sue-happy" since if she has retained council they would have told her to stop posting anything on a public forum. However I also feel that there may be some projection of anger from one party to another one.
I don't think that CJane is "sue-happy" since if she has retained council they would have told her to stop posting anything on a public forum. However I also feel that there may be some projection of anger from one party to another one.