Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) said Friday the rules governing lawmakers' oaths are too strict and could endanger the country in the case of a disaster or attack.
"I think [it] needs to be changed," he said. "It's way too restrictive, and it goes to the whole question of succession and [what happens] in the case of a disaster. To say members have to be sworn in, present on the floor, with the Speaker in the chair ? I think we need to revisit [that]."
The Oregon Democrat, who was in his district during Wednesday's opening of the 112th Congress, said he'd planned to be sworn in by a federal judge at home.
"I thought that was OK," DeFazio said. "We'd already arranged it."
As a last-minute precaution, DeFazio said he had his staff call the House clerk and parliamentarian ? both of whom said a federal judge was no substitute for an official oath-taking on the chamber floor.