amylouky said:Well, I'd certainly hope they're not ACTUALLY humping, since there's a CHILD underneath them??
Smiling JOe said:It feels good to now know the difference, eh? I know most people don't let signs get in the way of their own mission, but for sign readers/followers, what wording on a sign would help you know to keep out, the fragile nature of the dunes, the reasons to preserve them, and that even the flat parts are a part of the dune system? I don't know how to keep the wording brief enought that people will read, understand, and follow the rules. Understandably, there is confusion with "keep off the dunes" and seeing hundreds of footprints on a well worn path in between the dunes. The dunes are a system and are only as good as their weakest link ie-the flat parts. Personally, I think that most of these people in the dunes taking photos would not care anyway. I hear them saying, "we will only be a couple more minutes." I feel like telling them that I will thump their ear for only a few more minutes.
The dune system, if invaded by flat walkovers (walk-thru) would fail during storms, due to the low area of the flat walk-thru. Also, they would only accumulate as debris in the water and on the beach after the major storms, due to the wave action ripping them appart. It is not really a long walk to go one or two blocks to the east, and you just may meet some good folks along the way.TooFarTampa said:A keep out sign plunked in the middle of the path with a single chain draped between stakes would be more than enough for me. Or dune fencing; whatever. But really, the county needs to evaluate what is more important: ticking off some tourists temporarily or harming the future of tourism (by losing beach) in the long run? I know extra dollars are scarce, but since that and many other paths are so well-traveled and are so convenient, would building a flat walkover (a la Watersound) be OK? Or would that be damaging too?
TooFarTampa said:A keep out sign plunked in the middle of the path with a single chain draped between stakes would be more than enough for me. Or dune fencing; whatever. But really, the county needs to evaluate what is more important: ticking off some tourists temporarily or harming the future of tourism (by losing beach) in the long run? I know extra dollars are scarce, but since that and many other paths are so well-traveled and are so convenient, would building a flat walkover (a la Watersound) be OK? Or would that be damaging too?
Smiling JOe said:"Telling the truth so you don't have to!" -- Smiling Joe
I googled smiling joe and found a website with this quote and this attached photo. I need to ammend the photo caption to read dunes instead of border.