As I was involved in the process of posting this, the other thread had not been started. This seemed appropriate to the upcoming audit in that it's just this sort of attempt by a developer to skirt the rules that is part and parcel of the problem. Were this to pass the BCC, Sandestin would have a green light to bypass public notice and hearings, among other things. That said, when I have the time to post the remainder, and it's time-consuming, I intend posting on the NOPC thread that is now the better locus for this.