OK, I know all of you people enjoy this message board, etc. so I'll let you get back to the important things after I say this. I hope it is not a personal attack to say that I feel like I'm arguing with a six year old with below average intelligence. Maybe I'm grouchy because my 6am flight was cancelled and I had to ride in an Astrovan to Pensacola and show up a few hours late for a rather important meeting. Or maybe it is the 19 hour day on 4 hours sleep. Maybe it's because parents of young children don't know that they have to tell their children to pop their ears to keep them from screaming. Maybe it is the Caol Ila. Hell, maybe it is because I'm actually getting involved in the lowest common denominator of intellectual discourse, an internet message board. Regardless, I'm far more of a classic liberal than a conservative. I have neither the time nor the inclination to keep up with or get involved with political discourse here. And Tootsie, you have as much basis to call me a racist as I do to call you obese. Justice Louis Brandeis said, among other things, that "The greater dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding." That was pretty much the whole reason I replied to this damn thread. King meant well, and he did a hell of a lot, which I keep saying, but any favoritism based on the color of one's skin is wrong. Period. If higher learning is going to preach diversity, it?s best to start with the intellectual aspect, because God knows there isn?t intellectual diversity if a Harvard president can?t make an off the cuff comment on the innate differences of the sexes without being burned at the stake of political correctness.
I have absolutely no idea why I concede anything, when most don't even read the references I've linked, or pay attention to my argument. They just give the Pavlovian "racist" remark. And to get on a quick tangent, it's the left that's doing it. Look what the Kennedy?s and the rest of the democrats did to King.
As for Mr. King's personal character, again, Messrs. Fence Post, I have a problem with his personal character juxtaposed to his Christian preaching. That's why I used the Bakker example. I don't know why that's so hard to grasp.
Now back to your regularly scheduled internet message board discussion. I'll bow out. But for crying out loud, people, next time you see The Economist, or The Wall Street Journal, or hell, even the Old Grey Lady next to People, or Cosmo, or Maxim, at least once a month pick up one of the former. Good day.