• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
New posts

tsutcli

Beach Fanatic
Jan 14, 2008
914
109
Seacrest
We need those signs on the beach as well. Maybe big blue monster ones so people will notice them. Lots of loose dogs and you guessed it, doggie poops all over the place and I walk in bare feet. I hate to say this but our visitors don't respect our home or our beautiful beach. Disgusting!!!
 

scooterbug44

SoWal Expert
May 8, 2007
16,706
3,339
Sowal
It's not just visitors who let their dogs poop all over. I've seen many a local dog decorate the landscape. :roll:

The not-so-big brown signs are fine. Maybe next time someone with taste and common sense could review these things BEFORE we spend thousands of tax dollars on them?
 

tsutcli

Beach Fanatic
Jan 14, 2008
914
109
Seacrest
I understand what you are saying Scooterbug. I have covered the same 6 mile stretch of beach in Seacrest for 10 years now, all year round. But the loose dogs I observed yesterday and their feces close by were not dogs belonging to locals. I can only imagine what the beach is like today with all that dog activity yesterday. Again I say disgusting!
 

DuneAHH

Beach Fanatic
These are better (bar wasn't exactly set high), just can't help thinking that we have a lot of people suffering in our community, yet we are spending thousands on each of these stupid signs.

We now have more directional signs than we have major roads. At some point, common sense needs to be involved.

Nice that they moved the one on 395, so you can now follow its directions to Seagrove for several hundred feet before you drive into the gulf. :roll:

:lolabove::lolabove:
That observation cracks me up.
 

Morning Glory

Beach Comber
Nov 8, 2010
33
6
Blue Signs

There are two signs on hwy 81 that say "Hughes ditch". wtf?
Now we're naming ditches? :dunno: :lol:

Hughes Ditch is a water shed drainage ditch dug after WWII by crews working in a federal program called the CC's. From what I have always heard this program was to give work to young men returning from the war. Today it is the Army Corps of Engineers.
 

Rita

margarita brocolia
Dec 1, 2004
5,207
1,634
Dune Allen Beach
Hughes Ditch is a water shed drainage ditch dug after WWII by crews working in a federal program called the CC's. From what I have always heard this program was to give work to young men returning from the war. Today it is the Army Corps of Engineers.

.
The Civilian Conservation Corp (CCC) was created in the 1930s to provide employment for young men both civilian and veterans because of the extremely high unemployment. It put them to work at conservation and public works kinds of jobs.

The Army Corp of Engineers preceded them - not the same thing.

Here's an interesting article on the CCC. It certainly makes me think that something along those lines might be of benefit in today's economy.

The Manly History of the Civilian Conservation Corps | The Art of Manliness

excerpt
"By the late 1930?s, the CCC was reaching the end of its life. While it remained a tremendously popular program, the bettering economy and military draft were lowering the unemployment rate and number of men signing up. The need to prepare for war taxed the budget and the Army?s resources. When Japan attacked Pearl Harbor on December 7th, 1941, the immediate needs of the war became apparent and militarization of the country would end the CCC.
The end of the Civilian Conservation Corp in 1941 would not be the end of its benefits to the nation. The 3 million men who participated would be among the most ready to join in the 16.1 million strong American force that would fight the Axis powers. Already versed in teamwork and discipline and inured to the strain of hard work, CCC men found the transition to military life to be an easy one.

The great legacy of the CCC was the men it left behind. In its day the program was popular for its role in society. Unlike today?s battles over stimulus and jobs programs, the CCC received support from both sides of the aisle and people who otherwise opposed the president; it was supported by 67% of Republicans."


.
 

Morning Glory

Beach Comber
Nov 8, 2010
33
6
Blue Signs are Black

.
The Civilian Conservation Corp (CCC) was created in the 1930s to provide employment for young men both civilian and veterans because of the extremely high unemployment. It put them to work at conservation and public works kinds of jobs.

The Army Corp of Engineers preceded them - not the same thing.

Here's an interesting article on the CCC. It certainly makes me think that something along those lines might be of benefit in today's economy.

The Manly History of the Civilian Conservation Corps | The Art of Manliness
excerpt
"By the late 1930?s, the CCC was reaching the end of its life. While it remained a tremendously popular program, the bettering economy and military draft were lowering the unemployment rate and number of men signing up. The need to prepare for war taxed the budget and the Army?s resources. When Japan attacked Pearl Harbor on December 7th, 1941, the immediate needs of the war became apparent and militarization of the country would end the CCC.
The end of the Civilian Conservation Corp in 1941 would not be the end of its benefits to the nation. The 3 million men who participated would be among the most ready to join in the 16.1 million strong American force that would fight the Axis powers. Already versed in teamwork and discipline and inured to the strain of hard work, CCC men found the transition to military life to be an easy one.

The great legacy of the CCC was the men it left behind. In its day the program was popular for its role in society. Unlike today?s battles over stimulus and jobs programs, the CCC received support from both sides of the aisle and people who otherwise opposed the president; it was supported by 67% of Republicans."


.

Thanks for the info. I remember my father talking about the CCC being his first job.
 

DIXIE CLEANS

Beach Comber
Feb 25, 2011
13
6
Here is a newbie's perspective. I visited back when the blue signs were up. They honestly were terrible. Too big, too many and too tacky. That's just the humble opinion of little old me.

That said, I think the brown versions are a big improvement. They blend in and I believe they serve a purpose. This new local isn't bothered by them at all.

Dixie
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter