I am not sure that the photos you see proves anything about talent -- just having a little cheap fun.destindreamin said:Once again, SJ has proven that he is a man of many talents!![]()
I am not sure that the photos you see proves anything about talent -- just having a little cheap fun.destindreamin said:Once again, SJ has proven that he is a man of many talents!![]()
yeah...right...we have the technology to build her bigger and better....(insert reverberating noise to sound like someone jumping over a 30 foot wall with no assistance)Smiling JOe said:I make it up as I go along.

Cork On the Ocean said:Ok the dog people are back. I thought the dog eye was really creative. The boobs are a whole other issue.
I tend to disagree about gay Jonathan. Used to date a male stylist and there's 2 kind - Gay and those that do it to meet women.
From Jonathan's website - "As a teenager, he was inspired by Warren Beatty's role in the award-winning hit movie "Shampoo."
I think Jonathan's not gay - he's a slut![]()
:funn: :funn:Cork On the Ocean said:Ok the dog people are back. I thought the dog eye was really creative. The boobs are a whole other issue.
I tend to disagree about gay Jonathan. Used to date a male stylist and there's 2 kind - Gay and those that do it to meet women.
From Jonathan's website - "As a teenager, he was inspired by Warren Beatty's role in the award-winning hit movie "Shampoo."
I think Jonathan's not gay - he's a slut![]()
I VOTE FOR THE TAR YOU HAVE NOW!!!! very cool SJ.......I don't like it ........I LOVE IT!!!!:clap_1: :clap_1: :clap_1: It's a keeper!Smiling JOe said:Seems like the Gay JONs are winning out over my dog's eye. Any more voters???
You are only saying that because you recognize and like one of the people in it. :roll:Allifunn said:I VOTE FOR THE TAR YOU HAVE NOW!!!! very cool SJ.......I don't like it ........I LOVE IT!!!!:clap_1: :clap_1: :clap_1: It's a keeper!
UMMMM....Smiling JOe said:You are only saying that because you recognize and like one of the people in it. :roll:
OK.....who would that be?? I can't see it well enough...