Anyway, I wasn't in total agreement with his rant but there was a kernel of truth in what he said about some of the ticky tacky developments sprouting up on 30-A. I'm sure he was thinking of the same places that we're all thinking of and discussing on this board.
The big blue monsters are just another example of how our community has been running amuck and honestly, if they serve as the straw that breaks the camel's back, well then, they've served us well. Recognize the signs as a wake-up call that we need to be vigilant about what is going on, because obviously our commissioners aren't willing to go out on a limb to keep the public that they serve informed of what they do.
.
I for one am glad that one of our most pressing issues is ugly blue signs. We could be living in a place with a high crime rate, terrible air pollution, and all the other bad stuff that comes with big cities.
I would like to see the Blue monsters go away, but I do think there is a need for signs along the roads that connect to 30-A that give tourists an idea which way to go to their destination. I think the blue signs along 30-A are totally inappropriate, and each community should have its own in sign that fits its character. This whole "branding" approach is completely out of touch with what makes 30-A so special to all of us. If we really have to tie each community together for "cohesiveness" perhaps a small tribute to 30-a's scenic corridor status would be more appropriate than the TDC's Resort style marketing. I think we are reaching an identity crisis here. Are we a resort or are we a community? It is getting harder and harder to tell anymore.
. after the shock of seeing them passed, and finding out more about them on this thread and from other sources, I realize that its not that important to me, personally. given the big picture and all. almost everyone I know agrees that the signs do not fit in with the character of our area. some are very concerned. some are not at all. I thank leaders such as Dave who have decided to take action, and they are doing so in a positive way, non-confrontational, can-do, productive way. its what makes our community so great. Dave, the new logo with "please" included is on the shirt. Look for the Light Blue colored shirt, near the bottom. The shirt comes in your choice of colors -- Light Blue, Ash Gray, or Natural (unbleached cotton color). Thanks for the suggestion. Here is the link again.![]()
I'm attaching the new logo below for those who want to make their own stuff.

Attached (I hope) are 2 newspaper articles. The first is an article (approximately 1/4 of a newspaper page) on page 4 of the Beach Breeze published on October 3, 2002. This is the article that the TDC references that gave notice to the public that in January of 2008 (5 1/2 years later) these signs would appear on our roadways.
The drawings in the article are scary, scary, but the article states that it is a plan. According to the article, the "wayfinding family of signs" (I HATE that term) is proposed to reduce sign clutter. Ha!
A side note - you will see a private ad under the article that offers a reward for information leading to the arrest of the person who was stealing the "No Mo Ro" signs, which were signs in opposition to the re-election of Rosier Cutchens, County Commissioner. Rosier may have done alot of things that made people (including me) mad, but he was one of 2 commissioners (Pridgen being the other one) who voted against the signs (and the 1 penny bed tax used to fund it). He thought the signs were too expensive.
Just a little history.
The second article, published on February 26, 2004 (4 years ago) discusses the BCC meeting at which the new "bed tax" was authorized. It also mentions the signs, and it references Commissioner Cutchens' "no" vote and the fact that he did not favor spending money on the sign system.
So, it seems that there have been references to a "wayfinding" sign system now and again over the past 6 years, but as far as I know, there is no other drawing or depiction of the signs in the newspapers or other county-wide or easily-accessed media from Oct. 2002 until Jan. 2008. I also have not seen any article during that time period that discusses the $260,000 cost of the new sign system.
A time frame of almost 6 years from the date of the initial "notice" to the implementation of the signs is just too long for the public to reasonably remain involved in an issue. If you were unlucky enough to miss that October 2002 article, then you really had no "true" notice of the scope of the project at all.
Don't count on it. Those blue feet could sprout a sign we can all be proud of; even the TDC.

I'm still waiting to hear why we couldn't have just replaced any wood signs that were showing their age.
Based on the differing sign prices, we could have replaced each of the wood signs several times over.
