Well Dick Morris' character is certainly in question. Didn't the taxpayers pay for his expensive hookers? Isn't that why Clinton fired him?
Obama polls
- Thread starter Beanstalk
- Start date
-
Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
This is only an opinion; I find Dick to do something many in the media does not. He stimulates the mind to think outside the box. Of course he is controversial, that?s his job. A true journalist would provide the facts that they have. A columnist provides information and opinion. I mean come on now, who thinks Rush was not having a ?Flashback?(Oxycoton) moment last week with his attack on Obama?
Dick has been correct in some of his writings and he has not as well. Seems to me that he stimulates the mind to look around. Just an opinion here. Sometimes I like what he writes other times I don?t. But he gets me to look outside the box.
Dick has been correct in some of his writings and he has not as well. Seems to me that he stimulates the mind to look around. Just an opinion here. Sometimes I like what he writes other times I don?t. But he gets me to look outside the box.
Wonder who paid more? Dick or Bill?
Wonder if Dick got Monica? and thats why he was fired?:funn:
Wonder who paid more? Dick or Bill?
Wonder if Dick got Monica? and thats why he was fired?:funn:
My honest opinion is that Morris was insanely jealous of Clinton and the amount of women who would pay to have sex with him. Quite the opposite of Morris. I doubt any of these women including Monica would touch Morris with a 10 ft. pole. That's the source of Morris bitterness and vindictiveness against all things democratic, particularly Hillary who I'm sure he wanted to bag.
Last edited:
:funn::funn:What is the IRONY in that???? Was Clinton jealous, or something?? Yuk, yuk, yuk! Sorry, just struck me as funny! :rofl:
"Thank Gawd"...that's it! OK, if that's the way you feel, maybe I won't stop just yet. I see you didn't bother to contradict any of my opinions (yes, my opinions!) or read and research my post (supported by facts).
Andy, I have nothing against you personally in the least, and actually appreciate many of your comments, but if you are going to simply attack me "personally" with the "Thank Gawd" comment, at least have the nerve to read a few of the links I posted, research the facts presented in them (which I did), and post a well thought out, informed, educated, opposing opinion of your own.
Please notice that I didn't resort to using any insults toward you personally (just your attack of ME personally, and your lack of posted research) to make my opinion more clearly.
I have the right to state an opinion that doesn't agree with you or anyone else's. You have the right to insult me, but that doesn't make your case, or support your opinion very well, does it?
And Beanstalk, I'm not saying that Mr. Morris never has anything of relevance to say (although it will seldom be relevent to me), but this article lacks unmanipulated factual truth and is mostly conjecture and opinion. I believe these are two items best left out of well reported journalism. I'm just trying to remind us all of how Brinkley, Cronkite, and yes even Tim Russert would bring us these stories without the trumped up hype of today's "modern" alleged journalism. Making up stuff and reporting it is not journalism.
President Clinton probably never had to pay for anything sexual. Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac...yuk factor completely ignored for this post, just for you (and maybe a few others), Lynnie.
Lynnie, I don't see how you could possibly be serious. There is no irony at all. Clinton didn't have to pay for expensive hookers. If anything there is a lineup of fine attractive women who would pay to have sex with him. If there's any irony it's that he goes for women like Monica. Honestly in this particular arena, Bill Clinton is not jealous of anyone. He came, he saw, he conquered, though not necessarily in that order.
President Clinton probably never had to pay for anything sexual. Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac...yuk factor completely ignored for this post, just for you (and maybe a few others), Lynnie.
Translate yuk, yuk, yuk, as hardy, har, har. You can still ignore it, however. Just wanted to clarify my yuk! Which, I found that statement funny!
Holy smokesola!
I see the irony in that Clinton fired someone for having sex and making that judgment overtly to the American people. Clinton was impeached for lying about his sexual relations. That's the irony and humor I see. Y'all might not see it that way and that's ok. OK?