No, I don't think that all judges are fine upstanding people. There are good ones and bad ones. Being a judge doesn't make one good or bad.It is easy to poke fun, doesn't anyone see the arrogance on the part of the judge? Does everyone think that judges are all fine upstanding people. Once the judge sentenced her, she became the responsibility of corrections. It is no longer his business. The arrogant ego of the judge is what should be questioned here.
Not that I really care in the least bit, but I disagree that the Judge has no business stepping in when she was released against specific orders. The Sheriff is sworn to uphold the laws, and in this case, it sounds like he failed to do so. A Judge's order isn't some guideline from which the Sheriff can make his own decisions whether or not to follow. If Sheriff Joe,
From a CNN story on Sheriff Joe:
Arpaio is among the state's most popular office-holders. He enjoys an 85 percent approval rating among voters in the county, which at 9,200 square miles is larger than some states, and includes the city of Phoenix.
Even some inmates treat him like a celebrity. As the sheriff stands in a group of female prisoners, one presents a legal pad.
"You want an autograph? What you got here? What's your name?" he asks.
On another occasion, a male prisoner, a look of anger on his face, tries to talk to the sheriff, who quickly interrupts:
"You have been convicted. You're doing your time. Do your time and shut your mouth and do what you have to do."

What I mean is that I think the state owes her a certain amount of safety while in prison, and she should be confined from a population of bad apples that might be looking to kick her ass in order to achieve celebrity status. Basically that it is reasonable for her to be in a private cell and segregated from the general populace.