• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
New posts

Jdarg

SoWal Expert
Feb 15, 2005
18,068
1,973
Sometimes new developments aren't so pretty when the developers "leave" the trees. Yes, everything is beautiful when people buy the homes, then in about 4 years or so (sooner if there are drought conditions), the trees start to die. Why? Because developers don't want to go to the extra expense of protecting the trees from damage during the building process. They take away topsoil, drive equipment over root systems, which compacts the soil and damages the root system, and sometimes just repeatedly run into the trees with their heavy equipment, leaving big gauges in the trunks. What a surprise when the trees die!

That happened where we live now and there are very few big old trees left around the houses. We have no topsoil- it all has to be brought in, so rain runs right off the clay before it can really soak in. It is criminal. I wish they had just cut the trees all at their expense instead of us having to watch them die a slow death AND pay for their removal. Last fall, a huge dead limb fell from my neighbor's dead tree into our yard, and when it hit the ground, a big chunk broke off and crashed through my son's window - he was standing right inside this window at the time and the blinds kept the flying glass from slicng up his right-out-of-the-shower nakey body. Funny story now, and I'll save the rest of the story of his world record "streak" for another day. A month before this incident, an entire tree from the same neighbor's yard fell into our yard on a sunny windless day. Dead as a doornail. New neighbors have cut down all the remaining dead trees thank God.

I know now there are developments that are requiring the builders to restrict heavy equipment access around the trees and some other measures that I can't recall - but all designed to save the trees from the scenario described above. Cheap developers will just clear cut instead of go to the trouble (and it is trouble) to preserve vegetation in a way that allows it to live beyond the clsoing date on the property. Maybe some of y'all have more info on this- would like to hear it!
 

whitesands

Beach Lover
Sep 17, 2005
243
1
Sueshore said:
Thanks Kurt...you gave a good overview of the good, bad and the ugly on 30-A. Luckily, most of it is good.

After our return from the emerald coast this year, and upon reflection, I can see the concern people have for the construction. I guess you'd say most of it is good...it is a gorgeous place and most anyone would want to live there (ok, 'cept for the hurricanes), but we were taken by surprise by the amount of construction over the year since we'd last been (1 year ago). I guess, "the good, bad and ugly" 'bout sums it up. We're not owners, so we don't have the vested interest, but we still love the place.
 

Sheila

SoWal Insider
jdarg said:
Ah I get it! Something about you must be prominent to be allowed in. I guess it's the purple hair for Miss Kitty! :roll:

I will need to think of something prominent for me so I can come visit you. If I keep eating the pumpkin pie (just had some for breakfast-yum!), my butt will be so prominent that they will give me a house!

It's the circus thing for you gull friend! ;-)
 

SGB

Beach Fanatic
Feb 11, 2005
1,039
182
South Walton
jdarg said:
I know now there are developments that are requiring the builders to restrict heavy equipment access around the trees and some other measures that I can't recall - but all designed to save the trees from the scenario described above. Cheap developers will just clear cut instead of go to the trouble (and it is trouble) to preserve vegetation in a way that allows it to live beyond the clsoing date on the property. Maybe some of y'all have more info on this- would like to hear it!

It breaks my heart when I see the clear cutting going on everywhere I turn. I know next to nothing about what trees need to live, but it is possible to build houses, keep trees and have them continue to live. There is evidence in many places in the area. Old Seagrove has 50x100 foot lots, yet there are plenty of beautiful trees. Fishers Landing off Mack Bayou has a tree lined street and native vegetation in all the yards. The overall affect is much different than the Adams homes development across the street where all the trees were torn down. Preserving trees and vegetation and development can happen in harmony if people care.
 

iwishiwasthere

Beach Fanatic
Jul 12, 2005
2,875
36
Tennessee
Sunny Daze said:
I was totally amazed at the construction going on! And the clear cutting was so sad. One minute I was telling my husband how people just keep walking on the dunes, and the next minute we drive by construction and there are NO dunes. I just don't understand with all of the places for sell, why people keep wanting bigger/better than what is offered.

Although I enjoyed our condo and the area we stayed in, in retrospect, it seems sad to think about what WAS there before the buildings were built.

When we went to Grayton State Park, hubby said, "Now this is how the entire area should look!"

And he was right... :; sigh :: :dunno:


We stayed there last weekend, and it was wonderful. The beach was in really simple, but a feeling of old Florida. I had the best of both worlds since it was close to Seaside/Watercolor and Grayton Beach. Loved the walks on the lesser develped areas. I may survivie till the next trip. :D The only issue was no one in my group would go canoeing...too afraid of being in chilly water.
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter