Are you insured by Citizen's? If you are, then you are subsidized by public funds. Now your private property is yours, but we all help you keep it. Dissolving Citizen's would affect the majority of property owners (and drivers, and boat owners, and renters, and everyone else who pays that line item on their insurance policy for Citizen's) positively in lower premiums. It just makes sense that anyone who opposes beach restoration with public funds would also oppose subsidizing hazard insurance with public funds.
The people in NOLA who got FEMA money, got that money to help them survive - to buy groceries, and pay rent in the apartments they had to move to when their homes were destroyed. They didn't get FEMA money to replace sand in front of their homes to make the beach just as wide as it was before Katrina - a beach that they can then call private and throw people off of.
I think it is silly to say that one beachfront property owner can do whatever they want to "their" beach, and to assume that there is no effect on their neighbor, or to the public beaches which are close by. If you have a private beach walkover that rips away and destroys public beach dunes, you may need to pay an impact fee. If you armor your beach, and that causes erosion at a public beach to the east or west, you may need to pay an impact fee. To treat the beach as though it can be divided into 100-foot chunks which are completely independent of one another is laughable.
The county obviously thinks that if you put your seawall on public property, you owe the county $500 a year (which is quite a bargain). Maybe they have sent you a bill for beach clean up if you had a private walkover that ended up at topsail.
BMBV, are you privately or self-insured?
First of all, there is one quote in your post that tells me you don't have a clue with what you're talking about:
"They didn't get FEMA money to replace sand in front of their homes to make the beach just as wide as it was before Katrina - a beach that they can then call private and throw people off of. "
Where in the hell did you come up with that? Your inference that FEMA or any other public or government agency paid for our sand hauled in after Ivan and after Dennis is utterly and completely false. The money came directly out of our pockets.
Next topic:
Yes, we have Citizens....for
wind coverage like the majority of Florida property owners. Wind is no different on the gulf than it is, let's say, 1/4 mile off the gulf. A Cat 4 will damage the majority of us. So, your bringing up Citizens has NOTHING to do with anything on this thread.
Now regarding my SUPPOSED opposition of beach restoration with public funds:
I recognize there are areas in Florida that have absolutely no choice but to renourish the beaches. I can even get along with the ECL concept. BUT here's my problem...
How, when and who decides that a beach needs nourishment?
Taking a look at BMB this morning, it sure seems to me that the beach is looking pretty darn good.
So, in my book of logical reasoning, expending between 50 and 100 million dollars has to be looked at with dubious tinted sunglasses. In simple language, if the beach looks pretty good today, why would "we" spend all that money for beach nourishment? For preemptive reasons? I doubt it. The only reason, in my honest opinion, would be to effectively make those beaches public which would then set Walton County on the same (development) course as Destin and Panama City. I personally don't think that's desirable (unless you're a developer or a commissioner with similar motivations).
Regarding your repeated comments about damage to dunes from floating walkovers:
I gave you an honest observation based on hurricane Dennis videos. You ignore that. Then BeachSiO2 basically confirms the fact that it is the water (surge and waves) that does the real damage. You are apparently set in your views.
You mention seawalls on a public beach as well as the $500 "leases". This has nothing to do with anyone that I know of in Blue Mountain Beach including my property.
BH, you are all over the place...debris causing more destruction than water, Citizens, FEMA, seawalls, leases, beach nourishment, publc/private beaches...
My sense is that you just don't think beaches can be private property. And you will try to "shotgun" your way to try to back your position.
If you were to
focus on your REAL concern, maybe we could have a reasonable dialog.