I was not talking about crime in general, but shooting sprees like the recent one in Alabama - sorry, realize my post wasn't very clear on that point.
My theory was that as despair, unemployment, and stress grows, so will the incidence of shooting sprees.
The article you mentioned seems to agree with that, and I thought was rather balanced in presenting both sides - loved the guy who said reading the stats was like tea leaves - you can see anything if you try hard enough.
Some link economy with spate of killings - Washington Post- msnbc.com
"Experts agree that most mass murderers share one trait: a traumatic event such as a layoff, divorce or separation that sets off an internal rage and a desire for revenge. "It could be the loss of a job, the loss of a lot of money in the stock market, the loss of a relationship as in a nasty separation or divorce, the loss of a child who is in a child custody battle," Levin said. "There are just simply more catastrophic losses than there were when the economy was in good shape."
I still hope you're right and still doubt it.
For instance, Eric Harris/Dylan Klebold or John Allen Muhammad/John Lee Malvo. Mass murderers are damaged people without regard to the economy.
