I have no problem with criticism of the Vatican. For example, one could argue that Rome's stand on birth control contributes heavily to poverty.
I do however have a problem with this nasty skank, who seemingly can't make a joke without some reference to scat, urine or genitalia, using starving Africans as buffing cloths to shine her star among her peers. Do you honestly think insinuating that the Pope will "get loads of p***y" for having a yard sale serves any purpose other than inciting agitation in Catholics and giddiness among those that resent the institution?
I guess Sarah could have pointed out that those little starving kids with flies climbing around their eyes worship Allah and called the heads of the Muslim faith to task for allowing their acolytes to horde aid sent to feed the starving. She could have suggested that the gold plating mosque domes be melted down and sold to feed the starving. She could have proposed that pilgrimages to Mecca be halted for one year and Muslims send the money they would have spent to some group that will use the funds to buy food for the starving. And to place a cherry on top she could have said the Muslim elders would receive more p***y than could be provided by a harem of wives, and the graphic artists could have placed a woman in a burka flashing her goods while the comment was made.
But she didn't. A better target is the Vatican. Or maybe a better way to say it is that a more rewarding, lower risk target is the Vatican. Meanwhile, the Vatican probably sends more charity to destitute Muslims than does any Muslim organization. Conversely, how much charity is sent to poverty stricken Catholic kids by organized Islam, say in Guatemala perhaps? Probably none.
If you really think this piece is intended as serious social commentary, I don't think you can see the forest for the trees.
By the way, why is this still in the lounge? I think it probably belongs in the political forum.
