This reminds me that I meant to post about a letter I got from State Farm the other day. I still have my auto insurance with them, because so far nobody can beat their price. But the letter made me think maybe I ought to pay more just for the satisfaction of going elsewhere.
State Farm was never my home insurer. For more than a decade, I was with a company that left Florida, and I ended up with Citizens. Recently I was "taken out" of Citizens. So State Farm informs me that if I have auto insurance with them, which I do, and also either have Citizens or a company that took me out of Citizens, I am eligible for a discount on my auto insurance, but only if State Farm is the agent for the property insurance. As I read this, not only do they want to keep on writing auto insurance in Florida while leaving homeowners high and dry, they want to collect the commissions for that property insurance they are no longer offering. Am I missing something, or does this sound like double dipping, or maybe having your cake and eating it too would be more accurate?
State Farm was never my home insurer. For more than a decade, I was with a company that left Florida, and I ended up with Citizens. Recently I was "taken out" of Citizens. So State Farm informs me that if I have auto insurance with them, which I do, and also either have Citizens or a company that took me out of Citizens, I am eligible for a discount on my auto insurance, but only if State Farm is the agent for the property insurance. As I read this, not only do they want to keep on writing auto insurance in Florida while leaving homeowners high and dry, they want to collect the commissions for that property insurance they are no longer offering. Am I missing something, or does this sound like double dipping, or maybe having your cake and eating it too would be more accurate?

